Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SBHEX
RNWBX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SBHEX
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.70
Change+$0.31 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Retl
Price$10.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.05M
RNWBX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SBHEX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and SBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. SBHEX (79.1M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SBHEX (5.59) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SBHEX (11 years). SBHEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWBX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.79 vs. RNWBX (11.99). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.64 vs. RNWBX (18.24).
| RNWBX | SBHEX | RNWBX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.14 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.21 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.879 | 19.888 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.8B | 79.1M | 90,771% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 5.59 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.99 | 17.79 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.12 | 60.94 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.24 | 57.64 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.10 | 114.35 | 71% |