Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SBHEX
RNWBX vs SBHEX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SBHEX
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.39
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Retl
Price$11.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.68M
RNWBX vs SBHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SBHEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SBHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. SBHEX (84.7M). SBHEX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SBHEX (4.99) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SBHEX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SBHEX (11 years). SBHEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). SBHEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHEX: RNWBX (250) vs SBHEX (2500). SBHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.55 vs. RNWBX (17.87). SBHEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.62 vs. RNWBX (15.89).
| RNWBX | SBHEX | RNWBX / SBHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.14 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.21 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.896 | 29.497 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.1B | 84.7M | 87,485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 4.99 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.87 | 28.55 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.03 | 81.28 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.89 | 63.62 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.21 | 124.29 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement