Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SFENX
RNWBX vs SFENX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFENX
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.25
Change-$0.05 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.33B
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Mkts Eq Idx
Price$11.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
RNWBX vs SFENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFENX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SFENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. SFENX (1.3B). SFENX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFENX (3.76) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFENX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SFENX (18 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SFENX (0.39). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFENX (20.00). SFENX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: SFENX (0) vs RNWBX (250). SFENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.52 vs. RNWBX (11.81). SFENX return over 5 years is better than : 78.84 vs. RNWBX (26.47).
| RNWBX | SFENX | RNWBX / SFENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.39 | 428% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.39 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.065 | 25.301 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 1.3B | 5,806% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 3.76 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.81 | 13.52 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.92 | 69.02 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.47 | 78.84 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.78 | 112.14 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement