Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SFVLX
RNWBX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFVLX
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.84
Change+$0.24 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.42B
Seafarer Overseas Value Investor
Price$16.90
Change+$0.10 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.67M
RNWBX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFVLX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and SFVLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.4B vs. SFVLX (129M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFVLX (2.96) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SFVLX (9 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SFVLX (1.19). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWBX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). SFVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.13 vs. RNWBX (16.14). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 79.74 vs. RNWBX (25.27).
| RNWBX | SFVLX | RNWBX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.15 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.19 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.867 | 30.906 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.4B | 129M | 58,450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 2.96 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | 24.13 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.76 | 59.82 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.27 | 79.74 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers