Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SFVLX
RNWBX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFVLX
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.05
Change+$0.09 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.31B
Seafarer Overseas Value Investor
Price$15.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.93M
RNWBX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFVLX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and SFVLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.3B vs. SFVLX (114M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFVLX (3.22) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SFVLX (9 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SFVLX (1.17). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFVLX (3.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWBX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). SFVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.51 vs. RNWBX (9.60). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 81.91 vs. RNWBX (23.92).
| RNWBX | SFVLX | RNWBX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.15 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.17 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.636 | 23.315 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.3B | 114M | 61,667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 3.22 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.60 | 20.51 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.47 | 39.73 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.92 | 81.91 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement