Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SFVLX
RNWBX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFVLX
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.39
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
Seafarer Overseas Value Investor
Price$16.59
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.1M
RNWBX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFVLX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and SFVLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. SFVLX (119M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFVLX (3.14) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SFVLX (9 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SFVLX (1.17). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFVLX (11.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWBX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). SFVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.49 vs. RNWBX (10.83). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 79.68 vs. RNWBX (17.82).
| RNWBX | SFVLX | RNWBX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.15 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.17 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.458 | 28.660 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.8B | 119M | 60,336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 3.14 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.83 | 23.49 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.80 | 42.34 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.82 | 79.68 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers