Ad is loading...
RNWBX vs SFVLX
RNWBX vs SFVLX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SFVLX
American Funds New World R2
Price$79.71
Change+$0.25 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.23B
Seafarer Overseas Value Investor
Price$14.82
Change+$0.11 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.47M
RNWBX vs SFVLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SFVLX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and SFVLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 65.2B vs. SFVLX (98.5M). SFVLX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SFVLX (3.55) vs RNWBX (0.14). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SFVLX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SFVLX (9 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SFVLX (1.17). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFVLX (3.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFVLX: RNWBX (250) vs SFVLX (2500). SFVLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. RNWBX (2.17). SFVLX return over 5 years is better than : 78.07 vs. RNWBX (35.75).
| RNWBX | SFVLX | RNWBX / SFVLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.15 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.17 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.710 | 13.555 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.2B | 98.5M | 66,193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 3.55 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.17 | 6.03 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.63 | 28.57 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | 78.07 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...