Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs SNEMX
RNWBX vs SNEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs SNEMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.96
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
AB Emerging Markets
Price$34.15
Change-$0.18 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
RNWBX vs SNEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. SNEMX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and SNEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. SNEMX (1.24B). SNEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: SNEMX (1.66) vs RNWBX (0.12). RNWBX was incepted earlier than SNEMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs SNEMX (30 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than SNEMX (1.30). SNEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SNEMX: RNWBX (250) vs SNEMX (5000). SNEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.99 vs. RNWBX (11.48). SNEMX return over 5 years is better than : 33.60 vs. RNWBX (25.41).
| RNWBX | SNEMX | RNWBX / SNEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.30 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.30 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.671 | 27.148 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.2B | 1.24B | 6,045% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 1.66 | 7% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 16.99 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.43 | 62.66 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.41 | 33.60 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.19 | 59.08 | 146% |