Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TEGCX
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TEGCX
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.67
Change-$0.40 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
Price$15.33
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TEGCX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and TEGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. TEGCX (1.91B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TEGCX: RNWBX (0.13) vs TEGCX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TEGCX: RNWBX (23 years) vs TEGCX (7 years). TEGCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TEGCX (21.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEGCX: RNWBX (250) vs TEGCX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.84 vs. TEGCX (13.30). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.82 vs. TEGCX (-3.68).
| RNWBX | TEGCX | RNWBX / TEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.14 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.55 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.479 | 13.137 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8B | 1.91B | 3,711% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.84 | 13.30 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.52 | 19.30 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.82 | -3.68 | -675% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.54 | N/A | - |