Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TEGCX
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TEGCX
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.30
Change+$0.31 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.33B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
Price$16.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TEGCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and TEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. TEGCX (2.08B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TEGCX: RNWBX (0.12) vs TEGCX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TEGCX: RNWBX (23 years) vs TEGCX (7 years). TEGCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TEGCX (21.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEGCX: RNWBX (250) vs TEGCX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. TEGCX (8.01). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.53 vs. TEGCX (-7.26).
| RNWBX | TEGCX | RNWBX / TEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.14 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.55 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.133 | 20.443 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3B | 2.08B | 3,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | 8.01 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.67 | 30.56 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.53 | -7.26 | -407% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement