Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TEGCX
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TEGCX
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.97
Change+$0.63 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.9B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
Price$15.42
Change+$0.14 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TEGCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and TEGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.9B vs. TEGCX (1.98B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TEGCX: RNWBX (0.13) vs TEGCX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TEGCX: RNWBX (23 years) vs TEGCX (7 years). TEGCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TEGCX (21.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEGCX: RNWBX (250) vs TEGCX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.06 vs. TEGCX (9.19). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.44 vs. TEGCX (-10.57).
| RNWBX | TEGCX | RNWBX / TEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.14 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.55 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.246 | 14.834 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.9B | 1.98B | 3,631% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.06 | 9.19 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.53 | 22.14 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.44 | -10.57 | -203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement