Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs TEGCX
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs TEGCX
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.50
Change-$0.93 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
Price$15.87
Change-$0.11 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
RNWBX vs TEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. TEGCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Hold and TEGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. TEGCX (2.03B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than TEGCX: RNWBX (0.12) vs TEGCX (0.00). RNWBX was incepted earlier than TEGCX: RNWBX (23 years) vs TEGCX (7 years). TEGCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TEGCX (21.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEGCX: RNWBX (250) vs TEGCX (2500). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.50 vs. TEGCX (12.69). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.42 vs. TEGCX (-18.04).
| RNWBX | TEGCX | RNWBX / TEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.14 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.52 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.046 | 17.934 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.9B | 2.03B | 3,690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.50 | 12.69 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.20 | 31.09 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.42 | -18.04 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement