Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WIFMX
RNWBX vs WIFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WIFMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.70
Change+$0.20 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.83B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Instl
Price$3.81
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.76M
RNWBX vs WIFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WIFMX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and WIFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 69.8B vs. WIFMX (35.8M). WIFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: WIFMX (0.88) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WIFMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs WIFMX (10 years). WIFMX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WIFMX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WIFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WIFMX (100000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.55 vs. WIFMX (13.41). WIFMX return over 5 years is better than : 27.60 vs. RNWBX (20.45).
| RNWBX | WIFMX | RNWBX / WIFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.56 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.160 | 8.239 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.8B | 35.8M | 194,972% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.88 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.55 | 13.41 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.12 | 35.37 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.45 | 27.60 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement