Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWBX vs WIFMX
RNWBX vs WIFMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWBX vs WIFMX
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.70
Change+$0.31 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Instl
Price$3.90
Change+$0.01 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.16M
RNWBX vs WIFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWBX vs. WIFMX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWBX is a Buy and WIFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. WIFMX (35.2M). WIFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: WIFMX (0.88) vs RNWBX (0.13). RNWBX was incepted earlier than WIFMX: RNWBX (23 years) vs WIFMX (10 years). WIFMX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WIFMX (28.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WIFMX: RNWBX (250) vs WIFMX (100000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.99 vs. WIFMX (5.80). WIFMX return over 5 years is better than : 26.13 vs. RNWBX (18.24).
| RNWBX | WIFMX | RNWBX / WIFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 2.56 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.879 | 10.511 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.8B | 35.2M | 203,977% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.88 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.99 | 5.80 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.12 | 43.78 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.24 | 26.13 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.10 | N/A | - |