RNWEF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
709.83M
SUMCF
Price
$8.69
Change
+$0.88 (+11.27%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RNWEF vs SUMCF

Header iconRNWEF vs SUMCF Comparison
Open Charts RNWEF vs SUMCFBanner chart's image
REC SILICON ASA
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$182
Capitalization709.83M
Sum
Price$8.69
Change+$0.88 (+11.27%)
Volume$3.75K
Capitalization5.15B
RNWEF vs SUMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RNWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RNWEF vs. SUMCF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWEF is a Buy and SUMCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (RNWEF: $0.19 vs. SUMCF: $8.69)
Brand notoriety: RNWEF and SUMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RNWEF: 2% vs. SUMCF: 71%
Market capitalization -- RNWEF: $709.83M vs. SUMCF: $5.15B
RNWEF [@Semiconductors] is valued at $709.83M. SUMCF’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $5.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.22T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $62.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RNWEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSUMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RNWEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SUMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SUMCF is a better buy in the long-term than RNWEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RNWEF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUMCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RNWEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SUMCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SUMCF is a better buy in the short-term than RNWEF.

Price Growth

RNWEF (@Semiconductors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SUMCF (@Semiconductors) price change was +6.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+1.32% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUMCF($5.15B) has a higher market cap than RNWEF($710M). RNWEF has higher P/E ratio than SUMCF: RNWEF (666.67) vs SUMCF (7.59). SUMCF YTD gains are higher at: 12.474 vs. RNWEF (-35.330). SUMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 136B vs. RNWEF (-74.3M). SUMCF has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. RNWEF (49.1M). RNWEF has less debt than SUMCF: RNWEF (68.6M) vs SUMCF (141B). SUMCF has higher revenues than RNWEF: SUMCF (451B) vs RNWEF (142M).
RNWEFSUMCFRNWEF / SUMCF
Capitalization710M5.15B14%
EBITDA-74.3M136B-0%
Gain YTD-35.33012.474-283%
P/E Ratio666.677.598,787%
Revenue142M451B0%
Total Cash49.1M214B0%
Total Debt68.6M141B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RNWEF vs SUMCF: Fundamental Ratings
RNWEF
SUMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
387
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10081
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5172
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUMCF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNWEF (69). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

SUMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RNWEF (100). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew similarly to RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

SUMCF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as RNWEF (100). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew similarly to RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

SUMCF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as RNWEF (52). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew similarly to RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

RNWEF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SUMCF (72). This means that RNWEF’s stock grew similarly to SUMCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RNWEFSUMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RNWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMKIX13.11N/A
N/A
American Century Emerging Markets I
SWHFX23.38N/A
N/A
Schwab Health Care
USNQX56.45N/A
N/A
Victory NASDAQ-100 Index
LKBLX53.16N/A
N/A
LK Balanced Institutional
CSIRX28.75N/A
N/A
Columbia Acorn International Sel Inst3

RNWEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNWEF has been loosely correlated with RNWEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RNWEF jumps, then RNWEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNWEF
1D Price
Change %
RNWEF100%
N/A
RNWEY - RNWEF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TXN - RNWEF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
NVTS - RNWEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
ADI - RNWEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
IFNNY - RNWEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More

SUMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUMCF has been loosely correlated with SUOPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SUMCF jumps, then SUOPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUMCF
1D Price
Change %
SUMCF100%
+11.29%
SUOPY - SUMCF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
INTT - SUMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
STMEF - SUMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASMLF - SUMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
RNWEF - SUMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More