Advertisement
RNWEF vs SUMCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWEF is a Hold and SUMCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RNWEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSUMCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- RNWEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SUMCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RNWEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RNWEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SUMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
| RNWEF | SUMCF | RNWEF / SUMCF | |
| Capitalization | 90M | 2.89B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 188M | 123B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -28.523 | 7.466 | -382% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.40 | 41.24 | 37% |
| Revenue | 120M | 404B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 16.8M | 155B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 64M | 339B | 0% |
RNWEF | SUMCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SUMCF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNWEF (59). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.
SUMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RNWEF (100). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew similarly to RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.
SUMCF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as RNWEF (100). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew similarly to RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.
RNWEF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SUMCF (52). This means that RNWEF’s stock grew similarly to SUMCF’s over the last 12 months.
SUMCF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNWEF (51). This means that SUMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.
| RNWEF | SUMCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
RNWEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNWEF has been loosely correlated with RNWEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RNWEF jumps, then RNWEY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RNWEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNWEF | 100% | +10.53% | ||
| RNWEY - RNWEF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TXN - RNWEF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
| NVTS - RNWEF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.91% | ||
| ADI - RNWEF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| IFNNY - RNWEF | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.45% | ||
More | ||||
SUMCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUMCF has been loosely correlated with SUOPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SUMCF jumps, then SUOPY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUMCF | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| SUOPY - SUMCF | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| INTT - SUMCF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
| STMEF - SUMCF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASMLF - SUMCF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
| RNWEF - SUMCF | 21% Poorly correlated | +10.53% | ||
More | ||||