Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs TCEMX
RNWFX vs TCEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs TCEMX
American Funds New World R5
Price$86.27
Change-$0.08 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.7B
Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap C
Price$13.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.49M
RNWFX vs TCEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. TCEMX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Buy and TCEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 67.7B vs. TCEMX (342M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than TCEMX: RNWFX (1.09) vs TCEMX (0.00). RNWFX was incepted earlier than TCEMX: RNWFX (23 years) vs TCEMX (19 years). TCEMX (2.70) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TCEMX (20.02). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCEMX: RNWFX (250) vs TCEMX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. TCEMX (6.82). TCEMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.06 vs. RNWFX (30.94).
| RNWFX | TCEMX | RNWFX / TCEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.51 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.70 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.662 | 6.908 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.7B | 342M | 19,795% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | 6.82 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.68 | 22.63 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.94 | 39.06 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.73 | 16.43 | 370% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement