Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWFX vs TCEMX
RNWFX vs TCEMX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs TCEMX
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59B
Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap C
Price$13.56
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.29M
RNWFX vs TCEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. TCEMX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Buy and TCEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. TCEMX (346M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than TCEMX: RNWFX (1.04) vs TCEMX (0.00). RNWFX was incepted earlier than TCEMX: RNWFX (23 years) vs TCEMX (19 years). TCEMX (2.70) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TCEMX (20.02). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCEMX: RNWFX (250) vs TCEMX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.22 vs. TCEMX (9.98). TCEMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.26 vs. RNWFX (26.71).
| RNWFX | TCEMX | RNWFX / TCEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.51 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.70 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.839 | 8.916 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.6B | 346M | 20,405% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.22 | 9.98 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.79 | 20.75 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.71 | 31.26 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.60 | 24.13 | 309% |