Ad is loading...
RNWFX vs TEGCX
RNWFX vs TEGCX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs TEGCX
American Funds New World R5
Price$74.56
Change+$3.88 (+5.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.72B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
Price$13.34
Change+$0.77 (+6.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
RNWFX vs TEGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. TEGCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Buy and TEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 58.7B vs. TEGCX (1.74B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than TEGCX: RNWFX (1.17) vs TEGCX (0.00). RNWFX was incepted earlier than TEGCX: RNWFX (23 years) vs TEGCX (6 years). TEGCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TEGCX (17.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEGCX: RNWFX (250) vs TEGCX (2500). TEGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.98 vs. RNWFX (-10.37). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.34 vs. TEGCX (8.24).
| RNWFX | TEGCX | RNWFX / TEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.14 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.55 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.517 | -7.232 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.7B | 1.74B | 3,370% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.37 | -8.98 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.49 | -17.57 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.34 | 8.24 | 320% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.87 | N/A | - |