Ad is loading...
RNWFX vs WAESX
RNWFX vs WAESX Comparison
Open Charts RNWFX vs WAESX
American Funds New World R5
Price$81.97
Change+$0.21 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Investor
Price$17.13
Change-$0.05 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.58M
RNWFX vs WAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWFX vs. WAESX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWFX is a Buy and WAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. WAESX (394M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than WAESX: RNWFX (1.15) vs WAESX (0.00). RNWFX was incepted earlier than WAESX: RNWFX (23 years) vs WAESX (12 years). WAESX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAESX (14.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAESX: RNWFX (250) vs WAESX (2000). WAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. RNWFX (3.73). WAESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.16 vs. RNWFX (38.49).
| RNWFX | WAESX | RNWFX / WAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.37 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.37 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.096 | 3.944 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.8B | 394M | 16,193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.73 | 4.96 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.82 | 19.12 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.49 | 57.16 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.31 | 70.11 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers