Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RNWHX vs RSENX
RNWHX vs RSENX Comparison
Open Charts RNWHX vs RSENX
American Funds New World R5E
Price$83.18
Change+$0.11 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.33B
Victory Sophus Emerging Markets Y
Price$21.58
Change+$0.07 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.45M
RNWHX vs RSENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RNWHX vs. RSENX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RNWHX is a Buy and RSENX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 66.3B vs. RSENX (218M). RSENX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: RSENX (2.30) vs RNWHX (1.10). RNWHX was incepted earlier than RSENX: RNWHX (10 years) vs RSENX (16 years). RSENX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RSENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSENX: RNWHX (250) vs RSENX (1000000). RSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. RNWHX (5.61). RNWHX (40.96) and RSENX (39.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RNWHX | RSENX | RNWHX / RSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.99 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.36 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.419 | 12.220 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.3B | 218M | 30,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 2.30 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.61 | 8.95 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.79 | 21.01 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.96 | 39.35 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.53 | - |