Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ROFRX vs SSGSX
ROFRX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ROFRX vs SSGSX
Royce Small-Cap Opportunity R
Price$13.23
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.37B
ROFRX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ROFRX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ROFRX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.37B vs. ROFRX (1.03B). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ROFRX: SSGSX (0.50) vs ROFRX (0.00). ROFRX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ROFRX (18 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). ROFRX (1.85) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. ROFRX (35.00). ROFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ROFRX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). ROFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.16 vs. SSGSX (-5.17). ROFRX return over 5 years is better than : 27.21 vs. SSGSX (14.10).
| ROFRX | SSGSX | ROFRX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.26 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.26 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.416 | -4.932 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 5.37B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.16 | -5.17 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.08 | -7.99 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.21 | 14.10 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.65 | 12.22 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement