ROM
Price
$140.78
Change
+$0.24 (+0.17%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
1.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TQQQ
Price
$71.17
Change
+$0.69 (+0.98%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
35.79B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ROM vs TQQQ

ROM vs TQQQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) vs. ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ)

Key Takeaways

  • ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) delivers 2x daily exposure to the S&P Technology Select Sector Index, providing focused leverage on large-cap U.S. technology companies.
  • ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) offers 3x daily exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, encompassing a broader set of growth-oriented companies across technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leveraged structures, resulting in distinct risk profiles where compounding effects and volatility decay influence longer-term outcomes differently than unleveraged benchmarks.
  • ROM carries a gross expense ratio of 0.95%, while TQQQ has a net expense ratio of 0.82%, reflecting modest differences in cost efficiency for leveraged exposure.
  • ROM maintains a narrower sector focus on technology, whereas TQQQ provides diversified exposure within the Nasdaq-100, potentially altering sensitivity to specific industry rotations.
  • Both products suit investors seeking amplified short-term exposure within growth sectors but require careful consideration of leverage mechanics and holding periods.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) represent two distinct leveraged strategies targeting high-growth segments of the U.S. equity market. While both provide magnified daily returns tied to technology and innovation themes, they differ in underlying indices, leverage multiples, and breadth of exposure. Investors comparing these exchange-traded funds (ETFs) often seek to understand how structural variations influence risk-adjusted positioning during periods of sector momentum or macroeconomic shifts. This comparison highlights durable characteristics that help differentiate their roles in portfolios focused on amplified technology or Nasdaq-100 participation.

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) Overview

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index. The fund employs a passive leveraged strategy using swaps and other derivatives to achieve its target exposure. It holds a concentrated portfolio reflecting the technology sector, with approximately 80-90 holdings dominated by large-cap names. Top holdings typically include major semiconductor and software leaders such as NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Apple Inc. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on information technology. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a daily-reset product, ROM resets leverage each trading day, making it suitable for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies without active monitoring.

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) Overview

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times (3x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. This passive leveraged ETF also relies on derivatives for exposure and maintains a broader mandate than sector-specific products. Holdings number around 100, mirroring the Nasdaq-100 constituents with heavy weighting toward technology, communication services, and consumer discretionary companies. Prominent positions often feature NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc., and Broadcom Inc. The net expense ratio is 0.82%. Like ROM, TQQQ resets daily, amplifying both gains and losses while introducing volatility decay over extended periods of sideways or choppy markets.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from secular trends in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and semiconductor innovation. Capital flows into growth equities have remained resilient amid evolving interest rate expectations and corporate earnings cycles. Regulatory scrutiny on large technology platforms and supply-chain considerations represent ongoing considerations for the space. Broader macroeconomic drivers, including productivity gains from technological adoption and geopolitical developments affecting global chip manufacturing, influence sentiment across both the S&P Technology Select Sector Index and the Nasdaq-100 Index. These factors create an environment where leveraged exposure can magnify sector-specific momentum but also heighten sensitivity to shifts in risk appetite.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has exhibited performance closely aligned with amplified moves in pure technology equities, resulting in distinct volatility characteristics compared with broader growth benchmarks. ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ), with its higher leverage multiple and wider index exposure, has shown greater sensitivity to rotations involving non-technology Nasdaq-100 components during periods of changing economic data. Relative positioning reflects trade-offs between concentrated sector beta in ROM and diversified growth exposure in TQQQ. Both vehicles demonstrate pronounced drawdowns during risk-off episodes, underscoring the importance of time horizon when evaluating their behavior across earnings seasons or interest rate environments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) due to its broader diversification within the Nasdaq-100 Index, lower net expense ratio, and alignment with prevailing growth momentum across multiple sectors. ROM offers compelling targeted leverage for investors prioritizing pure technology exposure, yet the wider mandate and cost profile of TQQQ may provide a slight edge in risk-adjusted consistency over varied market regimes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ROM vs. TQQQ commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ROM is a Hold and TQQQ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TQQQ has more net assets: 35.8B vs. ROM (1.23B). ROM has a higher annual dividend yield than TQQQ: ROM (49.325) vs TQQQ (35.530). ROM was incepted earlier than TQQQ: ROM (20 years) vs TQQQ (17 years). TQQQ (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than ROM (0.95). ROM has a higher turnover TQQQ (25.00) vs TQQQ (25.00).
ROMTQQQROM / TQQQ
Gain YTD49.32535.530139%
Net Assets1.23B35.8B3%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.82116%
Turnover69.0025.00276%
Yield0.070.5812%
Fund Existence20 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ROMTQQQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ROM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEVAX12.290.18
+1.49%
JHancock Disciplined Value Em Mkts Eq A
PMFPX26.610.14
+0.53%
Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index R5
CRQSX15.930.07
+0.44%
Catholic Rspnsbl Invst Equity Idx Ins
RMFFX65.410.21
+0.32%
American Funds American Mutual R-5
DRTCX21.760.05
+0.23%
BNY Mellon Sust US Equity I

ROM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROM has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ROM jumps, then MU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROM
1D Price
Change %
ROM100%
+0.17%
MU - ROM
75%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
AMD - ROM
73%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
MKSI - ROM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
GLW - ROM
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
MRVL - ROM
63%
Loosely correlated
-5.57%
More

TQQQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TQQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TQQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TQQQ
1D Price
Change %
TQQQ100%
+0.98%
LRCX - TQQQ
77%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
AMAT - TQQQ
73%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
KLAC - TQQQ
73%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
ASML - TQQQ
72%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
AMD - TQQQ
70%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
More