ROMJF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.01 (-3.33%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
19.9M
SGIOY
Price
$7.47
Change
+$0.21 (+2.89%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
12.4B
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ROMJF vs SGIOY

Header iconROMJF vs SGIOY Comparison
Open Charts ROMJF vs SGIOYBanner chart's image
Rubicon Organics
Price$0.29
Change-$0.01 (-3.33%)
Volume$9.68K
Capitalization19.9M
Shionogi & Co
Price$7.47
Change+$0.21 (+2.89%)
Volume$95.61K
Capitalization12.4B
ROMJF vs SGIOY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SGIOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ROMJF vs. SGIOY commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ROMJF is a Hold and SGIOY is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (ROMJF: $0.29 vs. SGIOY: $7.47)
Brand notoriety: ROMJF and SGIOY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ROMJF: 33% vs. SGIOY: 52%
Market capitalization -- ROMJF: $19.9M vs. SGIOY: $12.4B
ROMJF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $19.9M. SGIOY’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $12.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ROMJF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGIOY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ROMJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SGIOY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SGIOY is a better buy in the long-term than ROMJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGIOY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SGIOY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ROMJF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +2.53% price change this week, while SGIOY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +5.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +77.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

SGIOY is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.14% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGIOY($12.4B) has a higher market cap than ROMJF($19.9M). SGIOY YTD gains are higher at: 7.329 vs. ROMJF (-11.980). SGIOY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 242B vs. ROMJF (1.21M). SGIOY has more cash in the bank: 563B vs. ROMJF (7.6M). ROMJF has less debt than SGIOY: ROMJF (10.4M) vs SGIOY (9.41B). SGIOY has higher revenues than ROMJF: SGIOY (427B) vs ROMJF (39.2M).
ROMJFSGIOYROMJF / SGIOY
Capitalization19.9M12.4B0%
EBITDA1.21M242B0%
Gain YTD-11.9807.329-163%
P/E RatioN/A9.62-
Revenue39.2M427B0%
Total Cash7.6M563B0%
Total Debt10.4M9.41B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ROMJF vs SGIOY: Fundamental Ratings
ROMJF
SGIOY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
912
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10077
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGIOY's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as ROMJF (38). This means that SGIOY’s stock grew similarly to ROMJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGIOY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ROMJF (100). This means that SGIOY’s stock grew similarly to ROMJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGIOY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ROMJF (91). This means that SGIOY’s stock grew significantly faster than ROMJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGIOY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as ROMJF (52). This means that SGIOY’s stock grew similarly to ROMJF’s over the last 12 months.

SGIOY's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as ROMJF (100). This means that SGIOY’s stock grew similarly to ROMJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGIOY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SGIOY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USDAUD1.56N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Australian Dollar
HKDEUR0.12N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - Euro
WILJX20.63-0.22
-1.06%
William Blair International Ldrs R6
BOGIX30.45-0.89
-2.84%
SGI Small Cap Core Fund I Shares
CTSIX36.35-1.64
-4.32%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth I

ROMJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ROMJF and SGIOF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ROMJF and SGIOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ROMJF
1D Price
Change %
ROMJF100%
-3.49%
SGIOF - ROMJF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGIOY - ROMJF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
RSCI - ROMJF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TEVJF - ROMJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCLOF - ROMJF
3%
Poorly correlated
-8.91%
More

SGIOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGIOY has been loosely correlated with TAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGIOY jumps, then TAK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGIOY
1D Price
Change %
SGIOY100%
+2.92%
TAK - SGIOY
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
ESAIY - SGIOY
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
KMDA - SGIOY
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
SCYX - SGIOY
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
SUPN - SGIOY
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.45%
More