Ad is loading...
RPFGX vs RYBKX
RPFGX vs RYBKX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs RYBKX
RPFGX vs RYBKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. RYBKX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Hold and RYBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 930M vs. RYBKX (22.7M). RYBKX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: RYBKX (3.85) vs RPFGX (1.48). RPFGX was incepted earlier than RYBKX: RPFGX (34 years) vs RYBKX (21 years). RYBKX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.95). RYBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (5%) and RYBKX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBKX: RPFGX (1000) vs RYBKX (2500). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. RYBKX (7.77). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 83.08 vs. RYBKX (65.13).
| RPFGX | RYBKX | RPFGX / RYBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.65 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.69 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.902 | -13.247 | 37% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 930M | 22.7M | 4,097% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 3.85 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | 7.77 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.76 | -0.27 | -7,573% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.08 | 65.13 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.30 | 53.37 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers