Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs RYBKX
RPFGX vs RYBKX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs RYBKX
RPFGX vs RYBKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. RYBKX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Hold and RYBKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. RYBKX (7.74M). RYBKX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: RYBKX (3.29) vs RPFGX (1.30). RPFGX was incepted earlier than RYBKX: RPFGX (35 years) vs RYBKX (21 years). RYBKX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RYBKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX (5%) and RYBKX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYBKX: RPFGX (1000) vs RYBKX (2500). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. RYBKX (5.51). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 89.59 vs. RYBKX (71.08).
| RPFGX | RYBKX | RPFGX / RYBKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.64 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.69 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.917 | 11.393 | 157% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 7.74M | 14,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 3.29 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.37 | 5.51 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.08 | 33.63 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.59 | 71.08 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.51 | 96.17 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement