Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs RYKAX
RPFGX vs RYKAX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs RYKAX
RPFGX vs RYKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. RYKAX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and RYKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. RYKAX (10.3M). RYKAX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: RYKAX (3.51) vs RPFGX (1.23). RPFGX was incepted earlier than RYKAX: RPFGX (35 years) vs RYKAX (28 years). RYKAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKAX: RPFGX (1000) vs RYKAX (2500). RYKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.60 vs. RPFGX (13.03). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 62.34 vs. RYKAX (54.90).
| RPFGX | RYKAX | RPFGX / RYKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.64 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.69 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.400 | 13.446 | 48% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 10.3M | 11,621% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 3.51 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.03 | 21.60 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.77 | 101.67 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.34 | 54.90 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.00 | 149.80 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement