Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs RYKAX
RPFGX vs RYKAX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs RYKAX
RPFGX vs RYKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. RYKAX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Hold and RYKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. RYKAX (8.08M). RYKAX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: RYKAX (3.28) vs RPFGX (1.26). RPFGX was incepted earlier than RYKAX: RPFGX (35 years) vs RYKAX (28 years). RYKAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RYKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKAX: RPFGX (1000) vs RYKAX (2500). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. RYKAX (7.10). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 88.11 vs. RYKAX (72.77).
| RPFGX | RYKAX | RPFGX / RYKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.64 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.69 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.193 | 17.493 | 127% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 8.08M | 14,351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 3.28 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | 7.10 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.41 | 39.84 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.11 | 72.77 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.01 | 106.01 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement