Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPFGX vs RYKCX
RPFGX vs RYKCX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs RYKCX
RPFGX vs RYKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. RYKCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Hold and RYKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. RYKCX (7.74M). RYKCX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: RYKCX (3.96) vs RPFGX (1.30). RPFGX was incepted earlier than RYKCX: RPFGX (35 years) vs RYKCX (25 years). RYKCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RYKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 280.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKCX: RPFGX (1000) vs RYKCX (2500). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. RYKCX (4.71). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 89.59 vs. RYKCX (64.79).
| RPFGX | RYKCX | RPFGX / RYKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.39 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.44 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.917 | 10.668 | 168% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 7.74M | 14,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 3.96 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.37 | 4.71 | 263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.08 | 30.67 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.59 | 64.79 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.51 | 81.82 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement