Ad is loading...
RPFGX vs RYKCX
RPFGX vs RYKCX Comparison
Open Charts RPFGX vs RYKCX
RPFGX vs RYKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPFGX vs. RYKCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPFGX is a Buy and RYKCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. RYKCX (25.6M). RYKCX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: RYKCX (4.73) vs RPFGX (1.51). RPFGX was incepted earlier than RYKCX: RPFGX (34 years) vs RYKCX (24 years). RYKCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.95). RYKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 233.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYKCX: RPFGX (1000) vs RYKCX (2500). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.55 vs. RYKCX (16.16). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 113.39 vs. RYKCX (87.30).
| RPFGX | RYKCX | RPFGX / RYKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.41 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.43 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.043 | -1.585 | -318% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 25.6M | 3,992% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 4.73 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.55 | 16.16 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.69 | 19.15 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.39 | 87.30 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.75 | 57.65 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers