RPKIF
Price
$23.17
Change
-$0.75 (-3.14%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
260.83M
TCLAF
Price
$14.53
Change
+$0.04 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RPKIF vs TCLAF

Header iconRPKIF vs TCLAF Comparison
Open Charts RPKIF vs TCLAFBanner chart's image
Richards Packaging Income Fund
Price$23.17
Change-$0.75 (-3.14%)
Volume$101
Capitalization260.83M
Transcontinental
Price$14.53
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
Volume$2.62K
Capitalization1.23B
RPKIF vs TCLAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RPKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RPKIF vs. TCLAF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPKIF is a Hold and TCLAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (RPKIF: $23.17 vs. TCLAF: $14.53)
Brand notoriety: RPKIF and TCLAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RPKIF: 20% vs. TCLAF: 34%
Market capitalization -- RPKIF: $260.83M vs. TCLAF: $1.23B
RPKIF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $260.83M. TCLAF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $1.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $5.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RPKIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCLAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RPKIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCLAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TCLAF is a better buy in the long-term than RPKIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RPKIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCLAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RPKIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TCLAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RPKIF is a better buy in the short-term than TCLAF.

Price Growth

RPKIF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TCLAF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +1.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+0.65% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCLAF($1.23B) has a higher market cap than RPKIF($261M). RPKIF has higher P/E ratio than TCLAF: RPKIF (14.64) vs TCLAF (9.39). TCLAF YTD gains are higher at: 24.140 vs. RPKIF (9.095). TCLAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 498M vs. RPKIF (55.1M). TCLAF has more cash in the bank: 43.2M vs. RPKIF (2.64M). RPKIF has less debt than TCLAF: RPKIF (102M) vs TCLAF (843M). TCLAF has higher revenues than RPKIF: TCLAF (2.78B) vs RPKIF (413M).
RPKIFTCLAFRPKIF / TCLAF
Capitalization261M1.23B21%
EBITDA55.1M498M11%
Gain YTD9.09524.14038%
P/E Ratio14.649.39156%
Revenue413M2.78B15%
Total Cash2.64M43.2M6%
Total Debt102M843M12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RPKIF vs TCLAF: Fundamental Ratings
RPKIF
TCLAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4637

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RPKIF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLAF (19). This means that RPKIF’s stock grew similarly to TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as RPKIF (100). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to RPKIF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RPKIF (100). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to RPKIF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as RPKIF (56). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to RPKIF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RPKIF (100). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to RPKIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RPKIFTCLAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RPKIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WEECX11.54N/A
N/A
TETON Westwood Equity A
IJMIX14.57N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Mid Cap Value I
RGERX21.44N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Global Equity Inst2
MNDKX33.55N/A
N/A
MFS New Discovery R6
CLREX55.79N/A
N/A
Columbia Balanced Inst2

RPKIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RPKIF and MNHFF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RPKIF and MNHFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RPKIF
1D Price
Change %
RPKIF100%
N/A
MNHFF - RPKIF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCLAF - RPKIF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WIPKF - RPKIF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNGSF - RPKIF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUMXF - RPKIF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TCLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLAF and SEE have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLAF and SEE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCLAF
1D Price
Change %
TCLAF100%
N/A
SEE - TCLAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
OI - TCLAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
HOYFF - TCLAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUMXF - TCLAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPKIF - TCLAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More