Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPLCX vs SCCNX
RPLCX vs SCCNX Comparison
Open Charts RPLCX vs SCCNX
T. Rowe Price Instl Lng Dur Crdt
Price$7.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.57M
Sterling Capital Long Dur Corp Bd C
Price$6.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.03M
RPLCX vs SCCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPLCX vs. SCCNX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPLCX is a Hold and SCCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPLCX has more cash in the bank: 197M vs. SCCNX (48M). RPLCX pays higher dividends than SCCNX: RPLCX (5.54) vs SCCNX (3.94). RPLCX was incepted earlier than SCCNX: RPLCX (12 years) vs SCCNX (12 years). SCCNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RPLCX (0.45). RPLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.30 vs. SCCNX (47.46). SCCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPLCX: SCCNX (1000) vs RPLCX (1000000). RPLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.58 vs. SCCNX (1.76). RPLCX return over 5 years is better than : -21.16 vs. SCCNX (-27.23).
| RPLCX | SCCNX | RPLCX / SCCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.45 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.59 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.475 | 1.767 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 197M | 48M | 410% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.54 | 3.94 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.58 | 1.76 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.53 | -2.23 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.16 | -27.23 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.00 | -14.33 | -84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement