Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPLCX vs SCCNX
RPLCX vs SCCNX Comparison
Open Charts RPLCX vs SCCNX
T. Rowe Price Instl Lng Dur Crdt
Price$7.42
Change-$0.03 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.91M
Sterling Capital Long Dur Corp Bd C
Price$6.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.66M
RPLCX vs SCCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPLCX vs. SCCNX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPLCX is a Hold and SCCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPLCX has more cash in the bank: 207M vs. SCCNX (45.7M). RPLCX pays higher dividends than SCCNX: RPLCX (5.69) vs SCCNX (4.02). RPLCX was incepted earlier than SCCNX: RPLCX (12 years) vs SCCNX (12 years). SCCNX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RPLCX (0.45). RPLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.30 vs. SCCNX (47.46). SCCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPLCX: SCCNX (1000) vs RPLCX (1000000). RPLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.70 vs. SCCNX (1.85). RPLCX return over 5 years is better than : -17.63 vs. SCCNX (-26.14).
| RPLCX | SCCNX | RPLCX / SCCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.45 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.59 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.037 | 1.403 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 207M | 45.7M | 453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.69 | 4.02 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.70 | 1.85 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.13 | 4.25 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.63 | -26.14 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.39 | -14.47 | -92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement