Ad is loading...
RPMGX vs SMFAX
RPMGX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs SMFAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.33
Change+$0.38 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.69B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$31.26
Change+$0.14 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets831.15M
RPMGX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. SMFAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and SMFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.7B vs. SMFAX (831M). RPMGX pays higher dividends than SMFAX: RPMGX (0.05) vs SMFAX (0.00). RPMGX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: RPMGX (33 years) vs SMFAX (13 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. SMFAX (16.00). RPMGX (2500) and SMFAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. RPMGX (3.12). SMFAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. RPMGX (4.05).
| RPMGX | SMFAX | RPMGX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.607 | 3.682 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.7B | 831M | 3,694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.12 | 12.28 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.66 | 8.92 | -41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.05 | 33.65 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.31 | 87.86 | 44% |