Ad is loading...
RPMGX vs SMFAX
RPMGX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs SMFAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$99.28
Change-$2.09 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.49B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$30.53
Change-$0.88 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets820.36M
RPMGX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. SMFAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and SMFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. SMFAX (820M). RPMGX pays higher dividends than SMFAX: RPMGX (0.05) vs SMFAX (0.00). RPMGX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: RPMGX (33 years) vs SMFAX (13 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. SMFAX (16.00). RPMGX (2500) and SMFAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. RPMGX (-5.34). SMFAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.20 vs. RPMGX (1.27).
| RPMGX | SMFAX | RPMGX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.451 | 1.260 | -36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.5B | 820M | 3,598% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | 4.81 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.07 | 13.58 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.27 | 29.20 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.08 | 71.23 | 35% |