Ad is loading...
RPMGX vs SMFAX
RPMGX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs SMFAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$99.82
Change-$3.46 (-3.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$31.66
Change-$1.17 (-3.56%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
RPMGX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. SMFAX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and SMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.4B vs. SMFAX (840M). RPMGX pays higher dividends than SMFAX: RPMGX (0.05) vs SMFAX (0.00). RPMGX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: RPMGX (32 years) vs SMFAX (13 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. SMFAX (16.00). RPMGX (2500) and SMFAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.86 vs. RPMGX (4.60). SMFAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. RPMGX (9.06).
| RPMGX | SMFAX | RPMGX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.239 | 17.418 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.4B | 840M | 3,738% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.60 | 18.86 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.96 | -1.56 | 574% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.06 | 41.33 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.01 | 80.30 | 46% |