Ad is loading...
RPMGX vs SMFCX
RPMGX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs SMFCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.33
Change+$0.38 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.69B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$27.40
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets831.15M
RPMGX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. SMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.7B vs. SMFCX (831M). RPMGX pays higher dividends than SMFCX: RPMGX (0.05) vs SMFCX (0.00). RPMGX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: RPMGX (33 years) vs SMFCX (13 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. SMFCX (16.00). SMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: SMFCX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). SMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.71 vs. RPMGX (3.12). SMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. RPMGX (4.05).
| RPMGX | SMFCX | RPMGX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.607 | 3.631 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.7B | 831M | 3,694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.12 | 10.71 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.66 | 5.47 | -67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.05 | 26.38 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.31 | 68.41 | 56% |