Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs SMFCX
RPMGX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs SMFCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.26
Change-$1.14 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.99B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$30.00
Change-$0.29 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets766.61M
RPMGX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. SMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Buy and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. SMFCX (767M). RPMGX (0.00) and SMFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: RPMGX (33 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). SMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: SMFCX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). SMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.94 vs. RPMGX (-4.11). SMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.26 vs. RPMGX (-2.21).
| RPMGX | SMFCX | RPMGX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.680 | 14.561 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27B | 767M | 3,520% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.11 | 12.94 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.56 | 51.07 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.21 | 21.26 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.25 | 85.12 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers