Ad is loading...
RPMGX vs SMFCX
RPMGX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs SMFCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$99.28
Change-$2.09 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.49B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$26.74
Change-$0.77 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets820.36M
RPMGX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. SMFCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. SMFCX (820M). RPMGX pays higher dividends than SMFCX: RPMGX (0.05) vs SMFCX (0.00). RPMGX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: RPMGX (33 years) vs SMFCX (13 years). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.70 vs. SMFCX (16.00). SMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: SMFCX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). SMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.32 vs. RPMGX (-5.34). SMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.10 vs. RPMGX (1.27).
| RPMGX | SMFCX | RPMGX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.451 | 1.135 | -40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.5B | 820M | 3,598% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.34 | 3.32 | -161% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.07 | 9.95 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.27 | 22.10 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.08 | 53.52 | 47% |