Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs SMFCX
RPMGX vs SMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs SMFCX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.70
Change-$0.49 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.31B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
Price$29.52
Change-$0.29 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets658.25M
RPMGX vs SMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. SMFCX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and SMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. SMFCX (658M). RPMGX (0.00) and SMFCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than SMFCX: RPMGX (33 years) vs SMFCX (14 years). SMFCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). SMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). SMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: SMFCX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). SMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.16 vs. RPMGX (-4.69). SMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.46 vs. RPMGX (0.40).
| RPMGX | SMFCX | RPMGX / SMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.96 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.978 | 11.649 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.3B | 658M | 4,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.69 | 12.16 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.83 | 37.94 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.40 | 18.46 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.56 | 84.76 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement