Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDDX
RPTIX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$101.89
Change-$0.19 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.01B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.83
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets939.91M
RPTIX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDDX commentary
Aug 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Hold and WFDDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. WFDDX (940M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: RPTIX (0.05) vs WFDDX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). RPTIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: RPTIX (500000) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.03 vs. RPTIX (-5.42). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.18 vs. WFDDX (-29.45).
| RPTIX | WFDDX | RPTIX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.039 | 3.788 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 940M | 2,979% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.42 | -1.03 | 525% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.20 | 19.03 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.18 | -29.45 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -9.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement