Ad is loading...
RPTIX vs WFDDX
RPTIX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDDX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$94.13
Change+$1.01 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.39B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$25.46
Change+$0.52 (+2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets889.18M
RPTIX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDDX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Hold and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDDX (889M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: RPTIX (0.06) vs WFDDX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). RPTIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: RPTIX (500000) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.87 vs. RPTIX (-13.02). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.50 vs. WFDDX (0.85).
| RPTIX | WFDDX | RPTIX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.14 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.17 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.917 | -10.029 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 889M | 3,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.02 | -9.87 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.68 | -12.34 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.50 | 0.85 | 3,945% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -26.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers