Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDRX
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$95.53
Change-$0.65 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.03B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$30.64
Change-$0.07 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets928.16M
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDRX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a StrongBuy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. WFDRX (928M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: RPTIX (0.06) vs WFDRX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: WFDRX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.89 vs. RPTIX (-9.48). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.23 vs. WFDRX (-16.96).
| RPTIX | WFDRX | RPTIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.808 | -3.005 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27B | 928M | 2,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.48 | -3.89 | 244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.61 | 27.75 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.23 | -16.96 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -15.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers