Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDRX
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$102.43
Change+$0.43 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.54
Change+$0.31 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets965.18M
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a StrongBuy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. WFDRX (965M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: RPTIX (0.05) vs WFDRX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: WFDRX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.33 vs. RPTIX (-1.11). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 8.79 vs. WFDRX (-17.31).
| RPTIX | WFDRX | RPTIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.389 | 2.942 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 965M | 2,902% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.11 | 4.33 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.02 | 36.21 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.79 | -17.31 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -9.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement