Ad is loading...
RPTIX vs WFDRX
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$91.47
Change+$1.96 (+2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.74B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$28.62
Change+$0.86 (+3.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets857.32M
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a StrongBuy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 25.7B vs. WFDRX (857M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: RPTIX (0.06) vs WFDRX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: WFDRX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.29 vs. RPTIX (-13.25). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.04 vs. WFDRX (-14.72).
| RPTIX | WFDRX | RPTIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.526 | -12.180 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.7B | 857M | 2,999% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.25 | -8.29 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.96 | -1.91 | 470% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.04 | -14.72 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -22.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers