Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDRX
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$100.49
Change-$0.86 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.24B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.55
Change-$0.06 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.85M
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. WFDRX (943M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: RPTIX (0.05) vs WFDRX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: WFDRX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.26 vs. RPTIX (-1.87). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 1.51 vs. WFDRX (-24.74).
| RPTIX | WFDRX | RPTIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.309 | 3.164 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 943M | 2,884% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.87 | 5.26 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.24 | 17.68 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.51 | -24.74 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -10.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement