Ad is loading...
RPTIX vs WFDRX
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$102.65
Change+$0.38 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.69B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 30.7B vs. WFDRX (1.07B). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: RPTIX (0.18) vs WFDRX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: RPTIX (9 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RPTIX (21.70). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: WFDRX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.95 vs. RPTIX (3.28). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 4.59 vs. WFDRX (-10.49).
| RPTIX | WFDRX | RPTIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.609 | 4.208 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.7B | 1.07B | 2,875% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | 15.95 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.23 | 4.74 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.59 | -10.49 | -44% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...