Ad is loading...
RPTIX vs WFDRX
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$89.36
Change-$4.77 (-5.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.39B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$27.16
Change-$1.90 (-6.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets907.23M
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 27.4B vs. WFDRX (907M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: RPTIX (0.06) vs WFDRX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: WFDRX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.92 vs. RPTIX (-12.24). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 34.95 vs. WFDRX (9.33).
| RPTIX | WFDRX | RPTIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.908 | -8.067 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 907M | 3,021% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.24 | -6.92 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.93 | -9.78 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.95 | 9.33 | 375% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -17.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...