Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDRX
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$103.61
Change+$0.18 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.31B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$34.18
Change+$0.32 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets951.35M
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Buy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 27.3B vs. WFDRX (951M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: RPTIX (0.05) vs WFDRX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: WFDRX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.54 vs. RPTIX (-3.71). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : 1.25 vs. WFDRX (-24.11).
| RPTIX | WFDRX | RPTIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.389 | 7.118 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.3B | 951M | 2,871% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.71 | 4.54 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.79 | 27.82 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.25 | -24.11 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.94 | -1.40 | -2,285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement