Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPTIX vs WFDRX
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts RPTIX vs WFDRX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$103.83
Change+$0.24 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.95B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$33.99
Change+$0.20 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets947.28M
RPTIX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPTIX vs. WFDRX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPTIX is a Buy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. WFDRX (947M). RPTIX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: RPTIX (0.05) vs WFDRX (0.00). RPTIX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: RPTIX (10 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPTIX (22.60). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: WFDRX (0) vs RPTIX (500000). WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.60 vs. RPTIX (-5.21). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : -1.19 vs. WFDRX (-28.70).
| RPTIX | WFDRX | RPTIX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.79 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.82 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.549 | 6.897 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27B | 947M | 2,851% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.21 | 0.60 | -875% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.80 | 40.97 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.19 | -28.70 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.06 | 1.29 | 2,410% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement