RRSFF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 28 closing price
SHGXY
Price
$0.87
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

RRSFF vs SHGXY

Header iconRRSFF vs SHGXY Comparison
Open Charts RRSFF vs SHGXYBanner chart's image
Aretto Wellness
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
Shenguan Holdings Group
Price$0.87
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
RRSFF vs SHGXY Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
RRSFF vs. SHGXY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRSFF is a Hold and SHGXY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (RRSFF: $0.01 vs. SHGXY: $0.82)
Brand notoriety: RRSFF and SHGXY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RRSFF: 100% vs. SHGXY: 100%
Market capitalization -- RRSFF: $287.02K vs. SHGXY: $120.15M
RRSFF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $287.02K. SHGXY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $120.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RRSFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHGXY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RRSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHGXY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHGXY is a better buy in the long-term than RRSFF.

Price Growth

RRSFF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHGXY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.46% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHGXY($120M) has a higher market cap than RRSFF($287K). SHGXY YTD gains are higher at: 34.255 vs. RRSFF (-63.030). SHGXY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 146M vs. RRSFF (-1.57M). SHGXY has higher revenues than RRSFF: SHGXY (1.03B) vs RRSFF (-88.4K).
RRSFFSHGXYRRSFF / SHGXY
Capitalization287K120M0%
EBITDA-1.57M146M-1%
Gain YTD-63.03034.255-184%
P/E RatioN/A48.78-
Revenue-88.4K1.03B-0%
Total Cash52.9KN/A-
Total Debt70KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHGXY: Fundamental Ratings
SHGXY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

RRSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RRSFF and SHGXY have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RRSFF and SHGXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRSFF
1D Price
Change %
RRSFF100%
N/A
SHGXY - RRSFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YMZBY - RRSFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JWLLF - RRSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OCGPF - RRSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUFBY - RRSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHGXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHGXY has been loosely correlated with MKC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHGXY jumps, then MKC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHGXY
1D Price
Change %
SHGXY100%
N/A
MKC - SHGXY
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
RRSFF - SHGXY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - SHGXY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDSYA - SHGXY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOSCF - SHGXY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More