Ad is loading...
RRSVX vs SSGSX
RRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RRSVX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.06
Change+$0.33 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.29B
RRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.29B vs. RRSVX (25.3M). RRSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RRSVX (1.14) vs SSGSX (0.52). RRSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RRSVX (8 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RRSVX (34.71) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RRSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs RRSVX (250000). RRSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.21 vs. SSGSX (-15.28). RRSVX return over 5 years is better than : 64.03 vs. SSGSX (22.94).
| RRSVX | SSGSX | RRSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.26 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 34.71 | 1.26 | 2,755% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.085 | -14.430 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.3M | 5.29B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.52 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.21 | -15.28 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.62 | -16.96 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.03 | 22.94 | 279% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers