Ad is loading...
RRSVX vs WCMFX
RRSVX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts RRSVX vs WCMFX
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$10.50
Change+$0.13 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.43M
RRSVX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RRSVX vs. WCMFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RRSVX is a Buy and WCMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMFX has more cash in the bank: 59.4M vs. RRSVX (25.3M). RRSVX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: RRSVX (1.14) vs WCMFX (0.00). RRSVX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: RRSVX (8 years) vs WCMFX (5 years). RRSVX (34.71) is less costly to investors than WCMFX (1.27). RRSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. WCMFX (22.00). WCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRSVX: WCMFX (100000) vs RRSVX (250000). RRSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.21 vs. WCMFX (-19.11). RRSVX return over 5 years is better than : 64.03 vs. WCMFX (45.24).
| RRSVX | WCMFX | RRSVX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.85 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 34.71 | 1.27 | 2,733% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.085 | -13.439 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 100000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.3M | 59.4M | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.21 | -19.11 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.62 | -1.80 | -90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.03 | 45.24 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers