RSGUF
Price
$4.19
Change
-$0.05 (-1.18%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
501.75M
SHVTF
Price
$3.35
Change
+$0.40 (+13.56%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
340.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RSGUF vs SHVTF

Header iconRSGUF vs SHVTF Comparison
Open Charts RSGUF vs SHVTFBanner chart's image
Rogers Sugar
Price$4.19
Change-$0.05 (-1.18%)
Volume$11.2K
Capitalization501.75M
Select Harvests
Price$3.35
Change+$0.40 (+13.56%)
Volume$300
Capitalization340.25M
RSGUF vs SHVTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RSGUF vs. SHVTF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSGUF is a Hold and SHVTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RSGUF: $4.19 vs. SHVTF: $3.35)
Brand notoriety: RSGUF and SHVTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RSGUF: 440% vs. SHVTF: 98%
Market capitalization -- RSGUF: $501.75M vs. SHVTF: $340.25M
RSGUF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $501.75M. SHVTF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $340.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RSGUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHVTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RSGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSGUF is a better buy in the long-term than SHVTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSGUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RSGUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

RSGUF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.78% price change this week, while SHVTF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHVTF is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSGUF($502M) has a higher market cap than SHVTF($340M). SHVTF has higher P/E ratio than RSGUF: SHVTF (78.13) vs RSGUF (12.55). SHVTF YTD gains are higher at: 36.735 vs. RSGUF (2.506). RSGUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 119M vs. SHVTF (-128.24M). RSGUF has more cash in the bank: 5.83M vs. SHVTF (1.14M). SHVTF has less debt than RSGUF: SHVTF (378M) vs RSGUF (445M). RSGUF has higher revenues than SHVTF: RSGUF (1.13B) vs SHVTF (191M).
RSGUFSHVTFRSGUF / SHVTF
Capitalization502M340M148%
EBITDA119M-128.24M-93%
Gain YTD2.50636.7357%
P/E Ratio12.5578.1316%
Revenue1.13B191M593%
Total Cash5.83M1.14M514%
Total Debt445M378M118%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RSGUF vs SHVTF: Fundamental Ratings
RSGUF
SHVTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73100
SMR RATING
1..100
5584
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSGUF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHVTF (60). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHVTF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as SHVTF (100). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to SHVTF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SHVTF (84). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew similarly to SHVTF’s over the last 12 months.

SHVTF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as RSGUF (53). This means that SHVTF’s stock grew similarly to RSGUF’s over the last 12 months.

RSGUF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHVTF (100). This means that RSGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHVTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSGUFSHVTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RSGUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EGOAX19.320.18
+0.94%
Allspring Large Cap Core A
ADGAX25.000.23
+0.93%
AB Core Opportunities A
MITIX36.350.29
+0.80%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr I
VSQFX17.980.09
+0.50%
Invesco MSCI World SRI Index R5
MACPX27.940.08
+0.29%
BlackRock Balanced Institutional

RSGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSGUF and LW have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSGUF and LW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSGUF
1D Price
Change %
RSGUF100%
-1.12%
LW - RSGUF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
DAR - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
CIADY - RSGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
SAPIF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
PRBZF - RSGUF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More

SHVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHVTF and VTSYF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHVTF and VTSYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHVTF
1D Price
Change %
SHVTF100%
N/A
VTSYF - SHVTF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIADF - SHVTF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRRFY - SHVTF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFMY - SHVTF
5%
Poorly correlated
-6.31%
RSGUF - SHVTF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
More