RSKIA
Price
$15.87
Change
+$0.07 (+0.44%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
77.63M
SCTBF
Price
$15.50
Change
+$0.35 (+2.31%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
8.82B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RSKIA vs SCTBF

Header iconRSKIA vs SCTBF Comparison
Open Charts RSKIA vs SCTBFBanner chart's image
Risk (GEORGE) Industries
Price$15.87
Change+$0.07 (+0.44%)
Volume$7.15K
Capitalization77.63M
Securitas A B
Price$15.50
Change+$0.35 (+2.31%)
Volume$1.79K
Capitalization8.82B
RSKIA vs SCTBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RSKIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RSKIA vs. SCTBF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSKIA is a Buy and SCTBF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (RSKIA: $15.87 vs. SCTBF: $15.50)
Brand notoriety: RSKIA and SCTBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RSKIA: 430% vs. SCTBF: 22%
Market capitalization -- RSKIA: $77.63M vs. SCTBF: $8.82B
RSKIA [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $77.63M. SCTBF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $8.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RSKIA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCTBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RSKIA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCTBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSKIA is a better buy in the long-term than SCTBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSKIA’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCTBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RSKIA’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SCTBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSKIA is a better buy in the short-term than SCTBF.

Price Growth

RSKIA (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -0.35% price change this week, while SCTBF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +23.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+23.33% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCTBF($8.82B) has a higher market cap than RSKIA($77.6M). SCTBF has higher P/E ratio than RSKIA: SCTBF (15.17) vs RSKIA (10.94). SCTBF YTD gains are higher at: 19.231 vs. RSKIA (-5.983). SCTBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.6B vs. RSKIA (7.02M). SCTBF has more cash in the bank: 6.82B vs. RSKIA (42.7M). RSKIA has less debt than SCTBF: RSKIA (950K) vs SCTBF (44.3B). SCTBF has higher revenues than RSKIA: SCTBF (160B) vs RSKIA (21.9M).
RSKIASCTBFRSKIA / SCTBF
Capitalization77.6M8.82B1%
EBITDA7.02M12.6B0%
Gain YTD-5.98319.231-31%
P/E Ratio10.9415.1772%
Revenue21.9M160B0%
Total Cash42.7M6.82B1%
Total Debt950K44.3B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RSKIA vs SCTBF: Fundamental Ratings
RSKIA
SCTBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7295
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2290
SMR RATING
1..100
5455
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3697
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSKIA's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SCTBF (23). This means that RSKIA’s stock grew similarly to SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

RSKIA's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCTBF (90). This means that RSKIA’s stock grew significantly faster than SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

RSKIA's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SCTBF (55). This means that RSKIA’s stock grew similarly to SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

SCTBF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as RSKIA (56). This means that SCTBF’s stock grew similarly to RSKIA’s over the last 12 months.

RSKIA's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCTBF (97). This means that RSKIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSKIASCTBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
35%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RSKIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OLOXF6.05N/A
N/A
Deutsche Bank AG (London Branch)
BALT32.50-0.01
-0.03%
Innovator Defined Wealth Shld ETF
MMIN23.00-0.07
-0.30%
NYLI MacKay Muni Insured ETF
AMUB19.28-0.15
-0.77%
UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP ETN Series B
MSFX35.73-0.43
-1.19%
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF

RSKIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSKIA and KSCP have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSKIA and KSCP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSKIA
1D Price
Change %
RSKIA100%
N/A
KSCP - RSKIA
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.47%
SCTBF - RSKIA
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCGPY - RSKIA
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RLXXF - RSKIA
-2%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
SDXAY - RSKIA
-3%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
More

SCTBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCTBF and NAUH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCTBF and NAUH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCTBF
1D Price
Change %
SCTBF100%
N/A
NAUH - SCTBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
EUBG - SCTBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
SDXOF - SCTBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCGPY - SCTBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSKIA - SCTBF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More