Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLAX vs RSLFX
RSLAX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RSLAX vs RSLFX
RSLAX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLAX vs. RSLFX commentary
Aug 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLAX is a Hold and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX (89B) and RSLFX (89B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RSLFX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: RSLFX (0.83) vs RSLAX (0.18). RSLAX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RSLAX (24 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLAX (41.00) and RSLFX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLAX (250) and RSLFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.12 vs. RSLAX (12.83). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.69 vs. RSLAX (-6.88).
| RSLAX | RSLFX | RSLAX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.70 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.70 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.487 | 15.231 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 89B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 0.83 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.83 | 15.12 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.44 | 43.19 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.88 | 0.69 | -995% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.17 | 92.23 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement