Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLBX vs SCWFX
RSLBX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts RSLBX vs SCWFX
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.65
Change-$0.23 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.91B
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$74.36
Change-$0.26 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.91B
RSLBX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLBX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLBX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX (81.9B) and SCWFX (81.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SCWFX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: SCWFX (0.53) vs RSLBX (0.06). RSLBX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: RSLBX (23 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.08). RSLBX (32.00) and SCWFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLBX (250) and SCWFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.46 vs. RSLBX (8.72). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.13 vs. RSLBX (10.51).
| RSLBX | SCWFX | RSLBX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.08 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.08 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.674 | 12.215 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.9B | 81.9B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.53 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.72 | 9.46 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.37 | 37.13 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.51 | 16.13 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.54 | 60.12 | 74% |