Ad is loading...
RSLBX vs SFCWX
RSLBX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts RSLBX vs SFCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$51.57
Change-$2.46 (-4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74B
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$62.46
Change-$2.98 (-4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74B
RSLBX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLBX vs. SFCWX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLBX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX (69.7B) and SFCWX (69.7B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SFCWX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: SFCWX (1.04) vs RSLBX (0.02). RSLBX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: RSLBX (23 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). RSLBX (32.00) and SFCWX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: RSLBX (250) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.72 vs. RSLBX (-5.77). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 53.43 vs. RSLBX (42.96).
| RSLBX | SFCWX | RSLBX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.65 | 269% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.65 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.244 | -4.980 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.7B | 69.7B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.77 | -4.72 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.08 | -5.29 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.96 | 53.43 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers