Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLBX vs SFCWX
RSLBX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts RSLBX vs SFCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$61.05
Change+$0.23 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.13B
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$74.14
Change+$0.28 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.13B
RSLBX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLBX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLBX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX (78.1B) and SFCWX (78.1B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SFCWX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: SFCWX (0.96) vs RSLBX (0.02). RSLBX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: RSLBX (23 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). RSLBX (32.00) and SFCWX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: RSLBX (250) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.73 vs. RSLBX (8.52). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 25.82 vs. RSLBX (17.23).
| RSLBX | SFCWX | RSLBX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.65 | 269% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.65 | 269% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.708 | 7.280 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.1B | 78.1B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.96 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | 9.73 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.05 | 32.94 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.23 | 25.82 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement