Ad is loading...
RSLBX vs SMCWX
RSLBX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts RSLBX vs SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$57.73
Change+$0.25 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.12B
American Funds SMALLCAP World A
Price$68.24
Change+$0.29 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.12B
RSLBX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLBX vs. SMCWX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLBX is a Buy and SMCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX (75.1B) and SMCWX (75.1B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SMCWX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: SMCWX (0.61) vs RSLBX (0.15). RSLBX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: RSLBX (23 years) vs SMCWX (35 years). RSLBX (29.00) and SMCWX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLBX (250) and SMCWX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. RSLBX (7.05). SMCWX return over 5 years is better than : 14.05 vs. RSLBX (8.17).
| RSLBX | SMCWX | RSLBX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.245 | 1.261 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.1B | 75.1B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.61 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.05 | 7.80 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.67 | -4.62 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.17 | 14.05 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.45 | 54.47 | 71% |