Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSLFX vs SFCWX
RSLFX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts RSLFX vs SFCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$76.43
Change-$0.81 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.5B
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$74.31
Change-$0.06 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.5B
RSLFX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLFX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLFX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX (78.5B) and SFCWX (78.5B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SFCWX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: SFCWX (0.94) vs RSLFX (0.86). RSLFX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: RSLFX (23 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). RSLFX (0.70) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). RSLFX (32.00) and SFCWX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: RSLFX (250) vs SFCWX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. SFCWX (6.28). RSLFX (20.82) and SFCWX (20.03) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RSLFX | SFCWX | RSLFX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.65 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.65 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.003 | 7.933 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.5B | 78.5B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.94 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.43 | 6.28 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.79 | 35.28 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.82 | 20.03 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement