Ad is loading...
RSLFX vs SFCWX
RSLFX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts RSLFX vs SFCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$66.88
Change+$1.17 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.94B
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$65.07
Change+$1.14 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.94B
RSLFX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSLFX vs. SFCWX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSLFX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX (67.9B) and SFCWX (67.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SFCWX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: SFCWX (1.04) vs RSLFX (0.95). RSLFX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: RSLFX (23 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). RSLFX (0.70) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). RSLFX (32.00) and SFCWX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: RSLFX (250) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX (-1.46) and RSLFX (-1.51) have marching annual gain over last year. RSLFX (30.70) and SFCWX (30.56) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RSLFX | SFCWX | RSLFX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.65 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.65 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.523 | -5.518 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.9B | 67.9B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.04 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.51 | -1.46 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.28 | 2.37 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.70 | 30.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers