Advertisement
RSMDF vs SAFLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSMDF is a Hold and SAFLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RSMDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- RSMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SAFLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RSMDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RSMDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
- SAFLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
RSMDF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -3.52% price change this week, while SAFLF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
RSMDF is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-2.03% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| RSMDF | SAFLF | RSMDF / SAFLF | |
| Capitalization | 35.8B | 823M | 4,350% |
| EBITDA | 2B | 107M | 1,871% |
| Gain YTD | 8.721 | 96.879 | 9% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.22 | 14.88 | 169% |
| Revenue | 5.26B | 999M | 526% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 72.6M | - |
| Total Debt | 846M | 115M | 736% |
RSMDF | SAFLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 97 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 46 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RSMDF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFLF (69). This means that RSMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFLF’s over the last 12 months.
SAFLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as RSMDF (75). This means that SAFLF’s stock grew similarly to RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.
RSMDF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SAFLF (68). This means that RSMDF’s stock grew similarly to SAFLF’s over the last 12 months.
SAFLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RSMDF (42). This means that SAFLF’s stock grew similarly to RSMDF’s over the last 12 months.
RSMDF's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFLF (100). This means that RSMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFLF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSMDF | SAFLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 23% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 26% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 26% | 1 day ago 30% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 31% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 23% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 25% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 67% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 21% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | N/A |
Advertisement
RSMDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RSMDF and NAOV have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSMDF and NAOV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RSMDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSMDF | 100% | +2.67% | ||
| NAOV - RSMDF | 30% Poorly correlated | -9.95% | ||
| RMD - RSMDF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| PFGTF - RSMDF | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| POSC - RSMDF | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
| SAFLF - RSMDF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SAFLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SAFLF and GMED have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAFLF and GMED's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GMED - SAFLF | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
| MYGN - SAFLF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.94% | ||
| OFIX - SAFLF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| MROPF - SAFLF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRRMF - SAFLF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||