RSNUF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
RXRLF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

RSNUF vs RXRLF

Header iconRSNUF vs RXRLF Comparison
Open Charts RSNUF vs RXRLFBanner chart's image
RENASCOR RES
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
Rex Minerals
Price$0.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.3K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
RSNUF vs RXRLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
RSNUF vs. RXRLF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSNUF is a Hold and RXRLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (RSNUF: $0.06 vs. RXRLF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: RSNUF and RXRLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RSNUF: 114% vs. RXRLF: 124%
Market capitalization -- RSNUF: $312.89M vs. RXRLF: $98.7M
RSNUF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $312.89M. RXRLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $98.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RSNUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRXRLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RSNUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RXRLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RXRLF is a better buy in the long-term than RSNUF.

Price Growth

RSNUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RXRLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSNUF($313M) has a higher market cap than RXRLF($98.7M). RXRLF YTD gains are higher at: 231.118 vs. RSNUF (-66.667). RSNUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.81M vs. RXRLF (-21.69M). RXRLF has more cash in the bank: 2.99M vs. RSNUF (1.86M).
RSNUFRXRLFRSNUF / RXRLF
Capitalization313M98.7M317%
EBITDA-1.81M-21.69M8%
Gain YTD-66.667231.118-29%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash1.86M2.99M62%
Total DebtN/A4.4M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

RSNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSNUF and GOCOF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSNUF and GOCOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSNUF
1D Price
Change %
RSNUF100%
N/A
GOCOF - RSNUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGPHF - RSNUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.14%
FNICF - RSNUF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RXRLF - RSNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGNMF - RSNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
-6.79%
More

RXRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RXRLF and AMYZF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RXRLF and AMYZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RXRLF
1D Price
Change %
RXRLF100%
N/A
AMYZF - RXRLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
FRACF - RXRLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPPRF - RXRLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.78%
SRKZF - RXRLF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCVNF - RXRLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More