RSNUF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
105.7M
SVMLF
Price
$0.47
Change
+$0.01 (+2.17%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
298.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RSNUF vs SVMLF

Header iconRSNUF vs SVMLF Comparison
Open Charts RSNUF vs SVMLFBanner chart's image
RENASCOR RES
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization105.7M
Sovereign Metals
Price$0.47
Change+$0.01 (+2.17%)
Volume$48.63K
Capitalization298.77M
RSNUF vs SVMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RSNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RSNUF vs. SVMLF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSNUF is a Hold and SVMLF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (RSNUF: $0.04 vs. SVMLF: $0.47)
Brand notoriety: RSNUF and SVMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RSNUF: 27% vs. SVMLF: 34%
Market capitalization -- RSNUF: $105.7M vs. SVMLF: $298.77M
RSNUF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $105.7M. SVMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $298.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RSNUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RSNUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSNUF is a better buy in the long-term than SVMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSNUF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVMLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RSNUF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SVMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both RSNUF and SVMLF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

RSNUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.36% price change this week, while SVMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVMLF($299M) has a higher market cap than RSNUF($106M). SVMLF YTD gains are higher at: 2.873 vs. RSNUF (-41.667). RSNUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.32M vs. SVMLF (-33.22M).
RSNUFSVMLFRSNUF / SVMLF
Capitalization106M299M35%
EBITDA-3.32M-33.22M10%
Gain YTD-41.6672.873-1,450%
P/E Ratio75.79N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSNUFSVMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
4%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RSNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VOLVF28.74N/A
N/A
Volvo AB
DVHGF0.07N/A
N/A
Devonian Health Group Inc.
KCKSF0.36N/A
N/A
Keck Seng Investments
LEFUF20.65-0.07
-0.34%
Leons Furniture Ltd.
CIADY18.21-0.35
-1.89%
China Mengniu Dairy Co., Ltd.

RSNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSNUF and MGPHF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSNUF and MGPHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSNUF
1D Price
Change %
RSNUF100%
N/A
MGPHF - RSNUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.05%
FNICF - RSNUF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVMLF - RSNUF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
CLRSF - RSNUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCVNF - RSNUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SVMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVMLF and VRRCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVMLF and VRRCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVMLF
1D Price
Change %
SVMLF100%
+1.20%
VRRCF - SVMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EULIF - SVMLF
11%
Poorly correlated
-6.27%
RSNUF - SVMLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
METOF - SVMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCVNF - SVMLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More