Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSPFX vs SSGSX
RSPFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RSPFX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.98B
RSPFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSPFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSPFX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. RSPFX (544M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than RSPFX: SSGSX (0.49) vs RSPFX (0.45). RSPFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RSPFX (30 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). RSPFX (1.33) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RSPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). RSPFX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RSPFX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RSPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.27 vs. SSGSX (-14.44). RSPFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.13 vs. SSGSX (2.06).
| RSPFX | SSGSX | RSPFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.26 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.26 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.962 | -4.415 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 544M | 4.98B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.49 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.27 | -14.44 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.63 | -10.47 | -54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.13 | 2.06 | 1,072% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.22 | 12.64 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement