Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSQCX vs SSGSX
RSQCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RSQCX vs SSGSX
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Consult
Price$13.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets456.73M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
RSQCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSQCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSQCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. RSQCX (457M). RSQCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RSQCX (1.61) vs SSGSX (0.49). RSQCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RSQCX (22 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). RSQCX (2.35) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSQCX (5.00). RSQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RSQCX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.94 vs. RSQCX (-15.82). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 2.50 vs. RSQCX (-14.28).
| RSQCX | SSGSX | RSQCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.26 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.758 | -4.243 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 457M | 4.96B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 0.49 | 332% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.82 | -13.94 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.03 | -10.31 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.28 | 2.50 | -570% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.64 | 12.84 | -223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement