Ad is loading...
RSQCX vs SSGSX
RSQCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RSQCX vs SSGSX
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Consult
Price$11.68
Change-$0.23 (-1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets490.84M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$38.73
Change-$1.63 (-4.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
RSQCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSQCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSQCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. RSQCX (491M). RSQCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RSQCX (1.74) vs SSGSX (0.52). RSQCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RSQCX (22 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RSQCX (2.35) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RSQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RSQCX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.24 vs. RSQCX (-17.24). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 51.13 vs. RSQCX (14.18).
| RSQCX | SSGSX | RSQCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.26 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.837 | -6.095 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 491M | 5.44B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 0.52 | 338% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.24 | -9.24 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.98 | -10.59 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.18 | 51.13 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.91 | 10.74 | -372% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...