Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSQCX vs SSGSX
RSQCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RSQCX vs SSGSX
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Consult
Price$13.80
Change-$0.14 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets493.72M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.54
Change-$0.45 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
RSQCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSQCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSQCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.49B vs. RSQCX (494M). RSQCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RSQCX (1.59) vs SSGSX (0.48). RSQCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RSQCX (22 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). RSQCX (2.35) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSQCX (5.00). RSQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RSQCX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.68 vs. RSQCX (-9.26). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 20.58 vs. RSQCX (-7.87).
| RSQCX | SSGSX | RSQCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.26 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.26 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.145 | 1.206 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 494M | 5.49B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 0.48 | 333% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.26 | -3.68 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.34 | 7.50 | -58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.87 | 20.58 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.00 | 20.51 | -132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement