It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RSSS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RSSS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STRM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
RSSS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.50% price change this week, while STRM (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.81%.
RSSS is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
STRM is expected to report earnings on Dec 16, 2024.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
RSSS | STRM | RSSS / STRM | |
Capitalization | 99.8M | 28.4M | 351% |
EBITDA | -992.07K | -5.43M | 18% |
Gain YTD | 51.154 | -46.824 | -109% |
P/E Ratio | 119.05 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 40.7M | 24.1M | 169% |
Total Cash | 2.7M | 4.09M | 66% |
Total Debt | 0 | 9.52M | - |
RSSS | STRM | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RSSS's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as STRM (84) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RSSS’s stock grew similarly to STRM’s over the last 12 months.
RSSS's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STRM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RSSS’s stock grew somewhat faster than STRM’s over the last 12 months.
RSSS's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as STRM (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RSSS’s stock grew similarly to STRM’s over the last 12 months.
RSSS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as STRM (50) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RSSS’s stock grew similarly to STRM’s over the last 12 months.
RSSS's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as STRM (76) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RSSS’s stock grew similarly to STRM’s over the last 12 months.
RSSS | STRM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago65% | 18 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 4 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RSSS and STRM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSSS and STRM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RSSS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RSSS | 100% | -0.25% | ||
STRM - RSSS | 22% Poorly correlated | +7.62% | ||
GDDY - RSSS | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
NCNO - RSSS | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.97% | ||
DATS - RSSS | 22% Poorly correlated | +5.45% | ||
SPSC - RSSS | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STRM has been loosely correlated with HNKPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STRM jumps, then HNKPF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
STRM | 100% | +7.62% | ||
HNKPF - STRM | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
LPSN - STRM | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.69% | ||
PHR - STRM | 25% Poorly correlated | +5.54% | ||
UPBD - STRM | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.52% | ||
DATS - STRM | 23% Poorly correlated | +5.45% | ||
More |