RSTRF
Price
$71.07
Change
+$4.03 (+6.01%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
22.6B
RTBRF
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.11 (-6.43%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
232.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RSTRF vs RTBRF

Header iconRSTRF vs RTBRF Comparison
Open Charts RSTRF vs RTBRFBanner chart's image
Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership
Price$71.07
Change+$4.03 (+6.01%)
Volume$712
Capitalization22.6B
Restaurant Brands NZ
Price$1.60
Change-$0.11 (-6.43%)
Volume$200
Capitalization232.1M
RSTRF vs RTBRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RSTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RSTRF vs. RTBRF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSTRF is a Hold and RTBRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (RSTRF: $70.45 vs. RTBRF: $1.60)
Brand notoriety: RSTRF and RTBRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RSTRF: 86% vs. RTBRF: 49%
Market capitalization -- RSTRF: $22.6B vs. RTBRF: $232.1M
RSTRF [@Restaurants] is valued at $22.6B. RTBRF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $232.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $210.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RSTRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RSTRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSTRF is a better buy in the long-term than RTBRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSTRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTBRF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RSTRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RTBRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSTRF is a better buy in the short-term than RTBRF.

Price Growth

RSTRF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RTBRF (@Restaurants) price change was -6.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.15% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSTRF($22.6B) has a higher market cap than RTBRF($232M). RSTRF has higher P/E ratio than RTBRF: RSTRF (23.93) vs RTBRF (12.34). RSTRF (1.924) and RTBRF (1.911) have similar YTD gains . RSTRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.57B vs. RTBRF (157M). RSTRF has higher revenues than RTBRF: RSTRF (8.78B) vs RTBRF (1.37B).
RSTRFRTBRFRSTRF / RTBRF
Capitalization22.6B232M9,741%
EBITDA2.57B157M1,639%
Gain YTD1.9241.911101%
P/E Ratio23.9312.34194%
Revenue8.78B1.37B641%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt15.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RSTRF vs RTBRF: Fundamental Ratings
RSTRF
RTBRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5096
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38100
SMR RATING
1..100
3590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5483
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTBRF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RSTRF (98). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew significantly faster than RSTRF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTBRF (100). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTBRF (90). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as RTBRF (83). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew similarly to RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

RSTRF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RTBRF (93). This means that RSTRF’s stock grew significantly faster than RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSTRFRTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RSTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LPG25.960.20
+0.78%
DORIAN LPG Ltd
SOHU13.780.09
+0.66%
Sohu.com Limited
CHSCL25.470.04
+0.16%
CHS
VIPS14.99-0.08
-0.53%
Vipshop Holdings Limited
IROQ24.28-0.26
-1.06%
IF Bancorp

RSTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSTRF and SGLOF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSTRF and SGLOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSTRF
1D Price
Change %
RSTRF100%
N/A
SGLOF - RSTRF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEN - RSTRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
MTYFF - RSTRF
13%
Poorly correlated
+8.66%
PZRIF - RSTRF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
RTBRF - RSTRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RTBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTBRF and NROM have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTBRF and NROM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTBRF
1D Price
Change %
RTBRF100%
N/A
NROM - RTBRF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - RTBRF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
SIRZF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - RTBRF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
More