Ad is loading...
RTBRF
Price
$2.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
SIRZF
Price
$9.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

RTBRF vs SIRZF

Header iconRTBRF vs SIRZF Comparison
Open Charts RTBRF vs SIRZFBanner chart's image
Restaurant Brands NZ
Price$2.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.3K
CapitalizationN/A
Sir Rty Income Fund
Price$9.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
RTBRF vs SIRZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RTBRF vs. SIRZF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTBRF is a Buy and SIRZF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (RTBRF: $2.15 vs. SIRZF: $9.50)
Brand notoriety: RTBRF and SIRZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RTBRF: 91% vs. SIRZF: 109%
Market capitalization -- RTBRF: $253.16M vs. SIRZF: $75.64M
RTBRF [@Restaurants] is valued at $253.16M. SIRZF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $75.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $209.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RTBRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIRZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RTBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIRZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIRZF is a better buy in the long-term than RTBRF.

Price Growth

RTBRF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SIRZF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.48% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTBRF($253M) has a higher market cap than SIRZF($75.6M). RTBRF has higher P/E ratio than SIRZF: RTBRF (17.10) vs SIRZF (5.83). RTBRF YTD gains are higher at: -10.417 vs. SIRZF (-21.488). RTBRF has higher revenues than SIRZF: RTBRF (1.37B) vs SIRZF (24.4M).
RTBRFSIRZFRTBRF / SIRZF
Capitalization253M75.6M335%
EBITDA157MN/A-
Gain YTD-10.417-21.48848%
P/E Ratio17.105.83293%
Revenue1.37B24.4M5,611%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTBRF vs SIRZF: Fundamental Ratings
RTBRF
SIRZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
8739
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8990
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SIRZF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as RTBRF (12). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew similarly to RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

SIRZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as RTBRF (100). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew similarly to RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

SIRZF's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTBRF (87). This means that SIRZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

RTBRF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SIRZF (57). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew similarly to SIRZF’s over the last 12 months.

RTBRF's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as SIRZF (90). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew similarly to SIRZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESRT10.590.05
+0.47%
Empire State Realty Trust
CTO19.530.03
+0.15%
CTO Realty Growth
DEO118.16-1.69
-1.41%
Diageo plc
NFE8.56-0.62
-6.75%
New Fortress Energy
MATH1.00-0.13
-11.16%
Metalpha Technology Holding Limited

SIRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIRZF and HELFY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIRZF and HELFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIRZF
1D Price
Change %
SIRZF100%
N/A
HELFY - SIRZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
KRIUF - SIRZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSPPF - SIRZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTBRF - SIRZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBGI - SIRZF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More