RTMAF vs RTMNF
To understand the difference between Reitmans Ltd. - Ordinary Shares - Class A (RTMAF) vs. Reitmans Ltd. (RTMNF) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class A
Ordinary Shares - Class A - Class A shares usually refer to common stocks with more voting rights than Class B shares. They often imply enhanced benefits such as dividend priority and liquidation preferences to the holder. Traditionally, this type of share helps a company's management to keep control over the company.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RTMAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTMNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RTMAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RTMNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RTMAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTMNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RTMAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RTMNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
RTMAF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а +3.82% price change this week, while RTMNF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was -7.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.38%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+0.09% weekly)Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
| RTMAF | RTMNF | RTMAF / RTMNF | |
| Capitalization | 119M | 119M | 100% |
| EBITDA | 92.9M | 92.9M | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 7.491 | -7.000 | -107% |
| P/E Ratio | 1.99 | 2.28 | 87% |
| Revenue | 812M | 812M | 100% |
| Total Cash | 69.4M | 69.4M | 100% |
| Total Debt | 96.5M | 96.5M | 100% |
RTMAF | RTMNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 28 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RTMAF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as RTMNF (78). This means that RTMAF’s stock grew similarly to RTMNF’s over the last 12 months.
RTMAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTMNF (95). This means that RTMAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTMNF’s over the last 12 months.
RTMAF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as RTMNF (81). This means that RTMAF’s stock grew similarly to RTMNF’s over the last 12 months.
RTMAF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as RTMNF (71). This means that RTMAF’s stock grew similarly to RTMNF’s over the last 12 months.
RTMAF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as RTMNF (6). This means that RTMAF’s stock grew similarly to RTMNF’s over the last 12 months.
| RTMAF | RTMNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 5 days ago 36% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 30% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 63% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 52% |
RTMAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RTMAF and BZTAF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTMAF and BZTAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RTMAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTMAF | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| BZTAF - RTMAF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NXGPY - RTMAF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RTMNF - RTMAF | 5% Poorly correlated | -7.00% | ||
| AMKYF - RTMAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NXGPF - RTMAF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RTMNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RTMNF and RTMAF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTMNF and RTMAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RTMNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTMNF | 100% | -7.00% | ||
| RTMAF - RTMNF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
| CURV - RTMNF | 1% Poorly correlated | +7.58% | ||
| NXGPF - RTMNF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BZTAF - RTMNF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RROTF - RTMNF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||