Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNAX vs VFWPX
RTNAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNAX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq A
Price$13.02
Change+$0.05 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.62B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$138.18
Change+$0.49 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
RTNAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNAX is a Buy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. RTNAX (4.62B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNAX: VFWPX (2.83) vs RTNAX (1.56). RTNAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNAX (10 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). RTNAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNAX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RTNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. VFWPX (10.56). RTNAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.03 vs. VFWPX (38.83).
| RTNAX | VFWPX | RTNAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.03 | 4,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.03 | 4,633% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.631 | 15.116 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.62B | 65.3B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 2.83 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.15 | 10.56 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.30 | 23.32 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.03 | 38.83 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.26 | 43.53 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers