Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNAX vs VFWPX
RTNAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNAX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq A
Price$13.95
Change-$0.16 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.08B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.92
Change-$1.47 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
RTNAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNAX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. RTNAX (5.08B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNAX: VFWPX (2.70) vs RTNAX (1.40). RTNAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNAX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNAX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.86 vs. RTNAX (21.29). VFWPX (34.76) and RTNAX (33.14) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RTNAX | VFWPX | RTNAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.03 | 4,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.03 | 4,633% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.890 | 26.112 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.08B | 75.5B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 2.70 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.29 | 22.86 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.67 | 47.03 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.14 | 34.76 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.27 | 70.71 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement