Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNAX vs VFWPX
RTNAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNAX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq A
Price$13.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.97B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.15
Change-$0.32 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
RTNAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNAX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. RTNAX (4.97B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNAX: VFWPX (2.68) vs RTNAX (1.47). RTNAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNAX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNAX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RTNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.31 vs. VFWPX (17.96). RTNAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.49 vs. VFWPX (43.47).
| RTNAX | VFWPX | RTNAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.03 | 4,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.03 | 4,633% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.156 | 24.071 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.97B | 71.3B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 2.68 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.31 | 17.96 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.72 | 49.10 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.49 | 43.47 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.10 | 72.18 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers