Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNAX vs VFWPX
RTNAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNAX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq A
Price$13.61
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.88B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$144.64
Change-$0.42 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
RTNAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNAX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. RTNAX (4.88B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNAX: VFWPX (2.79) vs RTNAX (1.52). RTNAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNAX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNAX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RTNAX (15.48) and VFWPX (14.95) have marching annual gain over last year. RTNAX (42.62) and VFWPX (40.65) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RTNAX | VFWPX | RTNAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.03 | 4,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.03 | 4,633% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.870 | 21.483 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.88B | 68.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 2.79 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 14.95 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.72 | 39.24 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.62 | 40.65 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.46 | 67.16 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement