Ad is loading...
RTNCX vs VFWPX
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
Price$11.04
Change+$0.48 (+4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.79B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$120.17
Change+$6.65 (+5.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.54B
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 59.5B vs. RTNCX (3.79B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: VFWPX (3.04) vs RTNCX (0.85). RTNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNCX (10 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). RTNCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.60 vs. RTNCX (-7.21). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 32.32 vs. RTNCX (30.01).
| RTNCX | VFWPX | RTNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.03 | 6,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.03 | 7,133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.546 | -5.091 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.79B | 59.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 3.04 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.21 | -6.60 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.04 | -2.32 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.01 | 32.32 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers