Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNCX vs VFWPX
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
Price$13.47
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.9B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$145.26
Change+$0.53 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. RTNCX (4.9B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: VFWPX (2.79) vs RTNCX (0.78). RTNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNCX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RTNCX (14.19) and VFWPX (14.10) have marching annual gain over last year. RTNCX (38.14) and VFWPX (37.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RTNCX | VFWPX | RTNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.03 | 6,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.03 | 7,133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.483 | 21.207 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.9B | 68.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 2.79 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.19 | 14.10 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.85 | 42.19 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.14 | 37.84 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.40 | 66.46 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement