Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNCX vs VFWPX
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
Price$13.12
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.71B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$140.33
Change+$0.70 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNCX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. RTNCX (4.71B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: VFWPX (2.76) vs RTNCX (0.77). RTNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNCX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RTNCX (12.11) and VFWPX (11.65) have marching annual gain over last year. RTNCX (39.37) and VFWPX (39.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RTNCX | VFWPX | RTNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.03 | 6,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.03 | 7,133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.905 | 16.936 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.71B | 68B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 2.76 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.11 | 11.65 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.11 | 40.06 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.37 | 39.02 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.79 | 46.45 | 79% |