Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNCX vs VFWPX
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
Price$13.01
Change+$0.13 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.64B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$139.20
Change+$1.36 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNCX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. RTNCX (4.64B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: VFWPX (2.83) vs RTNCX (0.79). RTNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNCX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RTNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.22 vs. VFWPX (13.77). RTNCX (46.06) and VFWPX (44.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RTNCX | VFWPX | RTNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.03 | 6,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.03 | 7,133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.369 | 15.437 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.64B | 65.3B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 2.83 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.22 | 13.77 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.82 | 33.63 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.06 | 44.97 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.29 | 46.05 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement