Ad is loading...
RTNCX vs VFWPX
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
Price$12.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.47B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$133.98
Change+$0.33 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.12B
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 62.1B vs. RTNCX (4.47B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: VFWPX (2.95) vs RTNCX (0.83). RTNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNCX (10 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). RTNCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX (8.55) and RTNCX (8.43) have marching annual gain over last year. RTNCX (54.89) and VFWPX (54.52) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RTNCX | VFWPX | RTNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.03 | 6,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.03 | 7,133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.717 | 11.739 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.47B | 62.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 2.95 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.43 | 8.55 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.94 | 25.82 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.89 | 54.52 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers