Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNCX vs VFWPX
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
Price$13.30
Change+$0.14 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.76B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.45
Change+$1.23 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. RTNCX (4.76B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: VFWPX (2.79) vs RTNCX (0.78). RTNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNCX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RTNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.09 vs. VFWPX (19.68). RTNCX (40.21) and VFWPX (38.81) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RTNCX | VFWPX | RTNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.03 | 6,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.03 | 7,133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.962 | 18.267 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.76B | 68.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 2.79 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.09 | 19.68 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.12 | 35.13 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.21 | 38.81 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.78 | 49.21 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers