Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNCX vs VFWPX
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
Price$13.73
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.02B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.50
Change-$0.42 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. RTNCX (5.02B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: VFWPX (2.70) vs RTNCX (0.72). RTNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNCX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.62 vs. RTNCX (20.12). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 33.14 vs. RTNCX (30.08).
| RTNCX | VFWPX | RTNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.03 | 6,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.03 | 7,133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.809 | 24.879 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.02B | 75.5B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 2.70 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.12 | 21.62 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.09 | 45.59 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.08 | 33.14 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.15 | 69.04 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers