Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNCX vs VFWPX
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNCX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
Price$13.88
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$149.08
Change-$0.38 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
RTNCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. RTNCX (5.04B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNCX: VFWPX (2.68) vs RTNCX (0.75). RTNCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNCX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNCX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX (18.36) and RTNCX (18.16) have marching annual gain over last year. VFWPX (44.42) and RTNCX (43.65) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RTNCX | VFWPX | RTNCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.03 | 6,900% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 0.03 | 7,133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.150 | 25.168 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.04B | 71.3B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 2.68 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.16 | 18.36 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.83 | 53.18 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.65 | 44.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.00 | 74.50 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers