Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNSX vs VFWPX
RTNSX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNSX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq S
Price$13.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.83B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.93
Change-$0.24 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.03B
RTNSX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNSX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNSX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68B vs. RTNSX (4.83B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNSX: VFWPX (2.76) vs RTNSX (1.69). RTNSX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNSX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNSX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNSX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). RTNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.52 vs. VFWPX (17.62). RTNSX return over 5 years is better than : 46.14 vs. VFWPX (42.21).
| RTNSX | VFWPX | RTNSX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.03 | 3,567% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.03 | 3,800% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.354 | 19.699 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.83B | 68B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 2.76 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.52 | 17.62 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.67 | 40.67 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.14 | 42.21 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.12 | 53.63 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement