Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RTNSX vs VFWPX
RTNSX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts RTNSX vs VFWPX
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq S
Price$14.03
Change-$0.16 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.08B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.92
Change-$1.47 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
RTNSX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTNSX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTNSX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. RTNSX (5.08B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than RTNSX: VFWPX (2.70) vs RTNSX (1.57). RTNSX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: RTNSX (10 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). RTNSX (1.14) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). RTNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). RTNSX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: RTNSX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.86 vs. RTNSX (21.62). VFWPX (34.76) and RTNSX (33.92) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RTNSX | VFWPX | RTNSX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.03 | 3,567% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.03 | 3,800% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.159 | 26.112 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.08B | 75.5B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 2.70 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.62 | 22.86 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.40 | 47.03 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.92 | 34.76 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.86 | 70.71 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers