RTPPF
Price
$62.23
Change
+$0.24 (+0.39%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
100.54B
SBWFF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
122.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RTPPF vs SBWFF

Header iconRTPPF vs SBWFF Comparison
Open Charts RTPPF vs SBWFFBanner chart's image
Rio Tinto
Price$62.23
Change+$0.24 (+0.39%)
Volume$106
Capitalization100.54B
CORNISH METALS
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization122.67M
RTPPF vs SBWFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RTPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RTPPF vs. SBWFF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTPPF is a Buy and SBWFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RTPPF: $62.24 vs. SBWFF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: RTPPF and SBWFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RTPPF: 1% vs. SBWFF: 5%
Market capitalization -- RTPPF: $100.54B vs. SBWFF: $122.67M
RTPPF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $100.54B. SBWFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $122.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RTPPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBWFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RTPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBWFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RTPPF is a better buy in the long-term than SBWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RTPPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBWFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RTPPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBWFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RTPPF is a better buy in the short-term than SBWFF.

Price Growth

RTPPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.38% price change this week, while SBWFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTPPF($101B) has a higher market cap than SBWFF($123M). SBWFF has higher P/E ratio than RTPPF: SBWFF (18.65) vs RTPPF (9.91). RTPPF YTD gains are higher at: 14.842 vs. SBWFF (2.407). RTPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22B vs. SBWFF (-3.67M). RTPPF has more cash in the bank: 9.33B vs. SBWFF (76.9M). SBWFF has less debt than RTPPF: SBWFF (13.5M) vs RTPPF (23.6B). RTPPF has higher revenues than SBWFF: RTPPF (53.7B) vs SBWFF (0).
RTPPFSBWFFRTPPF / SBWFF
Capitalization101B123M82,114%
EBITDA22B-3.67M-600,266%
Gain YTD14.8422.407617%
P/E Ratio9.9118.6553%
Revenue53.7B0-
Total Cash9.33B76.9M12,138%
Total Debt23.6B13.5M174,815%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTPPF vs SBWFF: Fundamental Ratings
RTPPF
SBWFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3432
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7192
SMR RATING
1..100
9992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4186
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTPPF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBWFF (75). This means that RTPPF’s stock grew significantly faster than SBWFF’s over the last 12 months.

RTPPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as SBWFF (92). This means that RTPPF’s stock grew similarly to SBWFF’s over the last 12 months.

SBWFF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as RTPPF (99). This means that SBWFF’s stock grew similarly to RTPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SBWFF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as RTPPF (51). This means that SBWFF’s stock grew similarly to RTPPF’s over the last 12 months.

RTPPF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBWFF (86). This means that RTPPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBWFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RTPPFSBWFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RTPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPRQF11.230.71
+6.75%
Choice Properties Real Estate Invt Trust
CLEV0.980.05
+5.81%
Concrete Leveling Systems Inc.
RNMBF2044.6664.66
+3.27%
Rheinmetall AG
ALYAF1.19N/A
+0.01%
Alithya Group Inc.
CTMLF9.18N/A
N/A
Corporate Travel Management Ltd

SBWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBWFF and SLI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBWFF and SLI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBWFF
1D Price
Change %
SBWFF100%
N/A
SLI - SBWFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.97%
LILIF - SBWFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
SHVLF - SBWFF
11%
Poorly correlated
-8.70%
SHERF - SBWFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTPPF - SBWFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More