Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RUDAX vs WCMFX
RUDAX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts RUDAX vs WCMFX
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.36
Change-$0.01 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.92M
RUDAX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RUDAX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUDAX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUDAX has more cash in the bank: 50.4M vs. WCMFX (5.92M). RUDAX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: RUDAX (1.28) vs WCMFX (0.00). RUDAX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: RUDAX (9 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). RUDAX (1.45) and WCMFX (1.45) have similar cost to investors . RUDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.75 vs. WCMFX (15.00). RUDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: RUDAX (1000) vs WCMFX (100000). RUDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.77 vs. WCMFX (-76.28). RUDAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.01 vs. WCMFX (-65.29).
| RUDAX | WCMFX | RUDAX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.90 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.45 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.214 | -71.870 | -3% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.4M | 5.92M | 851% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.77 | -76.28 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.33 | -67.31 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.01 | -65.29 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement