It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUSHB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTTSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUSHB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTSH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
RUSHB (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -2.33% price change this week, while TTSH (@Specialty Stores) price change was -7.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.03%.
RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
TTSH is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
RUSHB | TTSH | RUSHB / TTSH | |
Capitalization | 4.12B | 311M | 1,323% |
EBITDA | 737M | 37.4M | 1,971% |
Gain YTD | 4.070 | -12.364 | -33% |
P/E Ratio | 12.65 | 30.39 | 42% |
Revenue | 7.93B | 377M | 2,102% |
Total Cash | 184M | 8.62M | 2,135% |
Total Debt | 1.81B | 140M | 1,292% |
RUSHB | TTSH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 29 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHB's Valuation (27) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTSH (73) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTSH’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as TTSH (36) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to TTSH’s over the last 12 months.
TTSH's SMR Rating (81) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as RUSHB (86) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that TTSH’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as TTSH (57) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to TTSH’s over the last 12 months.
TTSH's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as RUSHB (27) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that TTSH’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB | TTSH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago72% | 12 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago72% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FGIRX | 43.86 | -0.32 | -0.72% |
Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income A | |||
LRSYX | 23.58 | -0.20 | -0.84% |
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value I | |||
RYVFX | 10.98 | -0.12 | -1.08% |
Royce Small-Cap Value Service | |||
HKDGBP | 0.10 | -0.00 | -1.77% |
Hong Kong Dollar - United Kingdom Pound | |||
USDJPY | 152.77 | -3.73 | -2.38% |
United States Dollar - Japan Yen |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RUSHB | 100% | -0.64% | ||
RUSHA - RUSHB | 90% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
LAD - RUSHB | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
ABG - RUSHB | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
PAG - RUSHB | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
AN - RUSHB | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTSH has been loosely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTSH jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TTSH | 100% | -0.31% | ||
ABG - TTSH | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
RUSHB - TTSH | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
HVT - TTSH | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
AN - TTSH | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
PAG - TTSH | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
More |