AutoNation, Inc. (AN) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) represent key players in the automotive dealership sector, with AN focusing on passenger cars and RUSHB specializing in commercial vehicles. This comparison analyzes their recent market performance, valuation metrics, and sector dynamics amid fluctuating vehicle demand and economic pressures. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing value in cyclical industries will find insights into relative strengths, such as momentum trends and profitability, helping inform stock comparison decisions in the current environment.
AutoNation, Inc. (AN) is a leading U.S. automotive retailer operating through segments including Domestic, Import, Premium Luxury vehicles, and finance services. It sells new and used cars, provides parts, repair, and insurance products across Sunbelt markets. In recent market activity, AN shares traded around $209, within a 52-week range of $155 to $229, supported by a market cap of about $7.3 billion. Sentiment has been influenced by solid full-year 2025 results showing 3% revenue growth, though quarterly revenue dipped 3.9% year-over-year. Shares recently surged alongside peers like Penske Automotive, but analysts adjusted price targets lower, reflecting cautious views on used-car dynamics and broader auto sales softening. Q1 2026 earnings, set for May 1, loom as a key catalyst.
Rush Enterprises, Inc. Class B (RUSHB) runs an integrated network of commercial truck dealerships under Rush Truck Centers, retailing vehicles from brands like Peterbilt and International, plus aftermarket parts, service, leasing, and insurance. It serves fleets and governments across North America. Recently, shares hovered near $74.50, nearing the 52-week high of $75 amid a $5.9 billion market cap. Strong YTD performance of 33% reflects robust commercial vehicle demand, with the stock hitting all-time highs in recent weeks. Annual revenues reached $7.4 billion, though quarterly growth slowed to -11.8% year-over-year. Leadership changes, like a new COO appointment, and upcoming Q1 results on April 28 have bolstered positive sentiment despite sector headwinds.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These virtual agents deliver real-time signals optimized for current market volatility, featuring swing trading on industrials, day trading semiconductors on 5-60 minute timeframes, and trend-following in small-caps or ETFs. Performance highlights include annualized returns from +15% to +168%, win rates of 54% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, with average trade durations from 1 day to 55 days and profit-to-drawdown ratios reaching 22. Examples: A semiconductors bot yields +97% annualized with 69% wins, while an industrials dip-tracker posts +34% returns. Explore these bots for varied styles suited to today's conditions and consider copy trading to leverage their edge.
While both AN and RUSHB thrive in vehicle retail, AN emphasizes passenger cars with broader consumer exposure, versus RUSHB's niche in durable commercial trucks tied to freight and construction cycles. Valuation contrasts show AN's cheaper trailing P/E (12.3 vs. 22.8) and higher profit margins (2.35% vs. 3.55%), but RUSHB offers a dividend yield of 1%. Recent momentum favors RUSHB with superior YTD gains and highs, while AN provides stability via higher ROE (27% vs. 12%). Risks include auto sales slowdowns for AN and supply chain issues for RUSHB; sentiment tilts positive for truck demand amid economic recovery signals.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward Rush Enterprises (RUSHB) based on consistent upward trend consistency, robust YTD relative performance exceeding 30%, and proximity to 52-week highs signaling strong momentum. AN offers attractive valuation and profitability but lags in recent price action. This positioning suggests higher near-term probability for RUSHB amid favorable commercial sector catalysts, though earnings outcomes could alter dynamics.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AN (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -2.63% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +3.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.34%.
AN is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| AN | RUSHB | AN / RUSHB | |
| Capitalization | 6.3B | 5.54B | 114% |
| EBITDA | 1.64B | 640M | 255% |
| Gain YTD | -8.805 | 31.415 | -28% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.21 | 22.21 | 46% |
| Revenue | 27.5B | 7.27B | 378% |
| Total Cash | 65.5M | 240M | 27% |
| Total Debt | 10.5B | 1.44B | 731% |
AN | RUSHB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHB's Valuation (15) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (68) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as AN (30) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.
AN's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHB (66) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as AN (54) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (65) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.
| AN | RUSHB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 61% | 23 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 62% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VXUS | 87.06 | 0.29 | +0.33% |
| Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | |||
| EZM | 74.87 | 0.16 | +0.21% |
| WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings ETF | |||
| JABS | 49.94 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
| Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Secs ETF | |||
| IWML | 31.45 | N/A | N/A |
| ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Fctr TR ETN | |||
| UJUN | 38.40 | -0.06 | -0.16% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jun | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHB | 100% | +1.91% | ||
| RUSHA - RUSHB | 83% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| ONEW - RUSHB | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| AN - RUSHB | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| HVT - RUSHB | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| ABG - RUSHB | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||