Advertisement
RUSMF vs TMTNF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUSMF is a Hold and TMTNF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUSMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMTNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- RUSMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TMTNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUSMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMTNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RUSMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- TMTNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
RUSMF (@Electronics Distributors) experienced а -2.34% price change this week, while TMTNF (@Electronics Distributors) price change was -1.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was -4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.86%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics Distributors (-4.25% weekly)Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.
| RUSMF | TMTNF | RUSMF / TMTNF | |
| Capitalization | 1.57B | 9.14B | 17% |
| EBITDA | 327M | 991M | 33% |
| Gain YTD | -3.391 | 42.089 | -8% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.40 | 26.10 | 51% |
| Revenue | 4.51B | 5.09B | 89% |
| Total Cash | 194M | 1.06B | 18% |
| Total Debt | 475M | 843M | 56% |
RUSMF | TMTNF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSMF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMTNF (59). This means that RUSMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMTNF’s over the last 12 months.
TMTNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as RUSMF (40). This means that TMTNF’s stock grew similarly to RUSMF’s over the last 12 months.
TMTNF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as RUSMF (68). This means that TMTNF’s stock grew similarly to RUSMF’s over the last 12 months.
TMTNF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as RUSMF (73). This means that TMTNF’s stock grew similarly to RUSMF’s over the last 12 months.
TMTNF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as RUSMF (47). This means that TMTNF’s stock grew similarly to RUSMF’s over the last 12 months.
| RUSMF | TMTNF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 30% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 37% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 36% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 31% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 16 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 44% |
Advertisement
RUSMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RUSMF and FAST have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUSMF and FAST's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FAST - RUSMF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| FERG - RUSMF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| GWW - RUSMF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
| AIT - RUSMF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| HDIUF - RUSMF | 8% Poorly correlated | -8.12% | ||
More | ||||
TMTNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TMTNF and DXPE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMTNF and DXPE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMTNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMTNF | 100% | -1.90% | ||
| DXPE - TMTNF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.55% | ||
| WJXFF - TMTNF | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
| CWXZF - TMTNF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FINGF - TMTNF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| RUSMF - TMTNF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||